Maximizing therapeutic benefit of rituximab: maintenance therapy versus re-treatment at progression in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma--a randomized phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network
- PMID: 15657401
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.12.191
Maximizing therapeutic benefit of rituximab: maintenance therapy versus re-treatment at progression in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma--a randomized phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the benefit of maintenance rituximab therapy versus rituximab re-treatment at progression in patients with previously treated indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Patients and methods: Between June 1998 and August 2002, 114 patients who had received previous chemotherapy for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with a standard 4-week course of rituximab. Patients with objective response or stable disease were randomly assigned to receive either maintenance rituximab therapy (standard 4-week courses administered at 6-month intervals) or rituximab re-treatment at the time of lymphoma progression. The duration of rituximab benefit was measured from the date of first rituximab treatment until the date other treatment was required.
Results: Ninety (79%) of 114 patients had objective response or stable disease after initial rituximab treatment, and were randomly assigned to treatment. Progression-free survival was prolonged in the maintenance group (31.3 v 7.4 months; P = .007). Final overall and complete response rates were higher in the maintenance group. Duration of rituximab benefit was similar in the maintenance and re-treatment groups (31.3 v 27.4 months, respectively). More maintenance patients remain in continuous remission, and more are currently in complete remission. Both treatment approaches were well tolerated.
Conclusion: In patients who have objective response or stable disease with single-agent rituximab therapy, duration of rituximab benefit is substantially prolonged with either scheduled maintenance treatment or rituximab re-treatment at the time of progression. At present, the magnitude of benefit with either approach appears similar. However, additional follow-up of this trial is required, and completion of phase III randomized trials is necessary to definitively answer this question.
Comment in
-
Optimizing rituximab in B-cell lymphoma.J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 20;23(6):1056-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.924. Epub 2005 Jan 18. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15657408 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Single-agent rituximab as first-line and maintenance treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma: a phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network.J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 1;21(9):1746-51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.027. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12721250 Clinical Trial.
-
Rituximab plus short-duration chemotherapy as first-line treatment for follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase II trial of the minnie pearl cancer research network.J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 1;23(7):1500-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.004. Epub 2005 Jan 4. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15632411 Clinical Trial.
-
Rituximab therapy for patients with newly diagnosed, advanced-stage, follicular grade I non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase II trial in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group.J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 20;23(6):1103-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.12.052. Epub 2005 Jan 18. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15657404 Clinical Trial.
-
The role of mitoxantrone in the treatment of indolent lymphomas.Oncologist. 2005 Feb;10(2):150-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-2-150. Oncologist. 2005. PMID: 15709217 Review.
-
Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: clinical trials in Japan.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;52 Suppl 1:S90-6. doi: 10.1007/s00280-003-0595-y. Epub 2003 Jun 18. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003. PMID: 12819934 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of a drug-disease simulation model for rituximab in follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Oct;68(4):561-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03494.x. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009. PMID: 19843059 Free PMC article.
-
Rituximab maintenance in relapsed or refractory follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: the evidence of its therapeutic value.Core Evid. 2007 Nov 30;2(2):121-9. Core Evid. 2007. PMID: 21221180 Free PMC article.
-
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor potentiates rituximab in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma: results of a phase II study.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 1;26(16):2725-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.7729. Epub 2008 Apr 21. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18427151 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
IELSG38: phase II trial of front-line chlorambucil plus subcutaneous rituximab induction and maintenance in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.Haematologica. 2024 Aug 1;109(8):2564-2573. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283918. Haematologica. 2024. PMID: 38385243 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost effectiveness of rituximab for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review.Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Jul 1;30(7):537-49. doi: 10.2165/11591160-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012. PMID: 22612993
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources