Importance of adrenal incidentaloma in patients with a history of malignancy

Abstract

Background: Adrenal incidentaloma presents a frequent finding in patients with a history of malignancy. This study was carried out to determine whether imaging techniques can discriminate between a malignant and a benign adrenal tumor and subsequently select candidates for adrenal surgery.

Methods: Beginning in July 1995, oncologic patients with adrenal incidentaloma underwent abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and [ 18 ]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (18-FDG-PET). Consecutively in all patients adrenalectomy was performed. Histologic findings were compared with the imaging results.

Results: In 42 patients, 33 to 79 years old (mean age, 58 years), 44 adrenal lesions were detectable. Two patients presented with bilateral adrenal masses. At operation, 43 adrenal resections and 3 biopsies were performed. Histologic examination revealed 31 metastases (71%) and 13 adrenal adenomas (29%). In metastases the sensitivity of ultrasonography, CT, MRI, and 18-FDG-PET was 66%, 81%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. For adrenal adenoma, the sensitivity of ultrasonography, CT, MRI, and 18-FDG-PET was 46%, 39%, 100%, and 54%, respectively.

Conclusions: In oncologic patients with indeterminate adrenal tumors MRI and 18-FDG-PET provide accurate differentiation between metastases and benign adenomas. Positive results of these 2 imaging modalities are highly suggestive for metastatic disease. In cases of negative MRI and 18-FDG-PET results the adrenal lesion corresponds to a benign adenoma that needs no surgical intervention.