[Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing]
- PMID: 15657755
- DOI: 10.1007/s00106-004-1170-5
[Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing]
Abstract
Background: The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the clinical parameters in patients implanted for combined, ipsilateral electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system.
Methods: A total of 18 patients with residual deep frequency hearing were implanted with a Combi 40+cochlear implant (MED-EL, Austria). Insertion depths ranged from 18 to 22 mm (360 degrees ). A modified surgical technique should contribute to hearing preservation in low frequency regions of the cochlea. Pure-tone audiometric thresholds were measured pre- and postoperatively. A speech audiometric evaluation was performed on two subjects.
Results: Utilizing adapted surgical procedures, the preservation of low frequency hearing was accomplished in 16 of 18 subjects (88.9%). Seven (38.9%) patients had complete and nine (50.0%) partial preservation of residual hearing. The speech discrimination scores of two patients documented an increase in sentence intelligibility when compared with only the cochlear implant.
Conclusions: Hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery is possible. Insertions of 360 degrees provide a full functioning cochlear implant to stimulate sufficient neural structures for above average discrimination scores with the implant alone. A synergistic effect of the electric and the acoustic stimulation modes leads to high discrimination scores in background noise.
Similar articles
-
Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation.Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 May;124(4):348-52. doi: 10.1080/00016480410016432. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004. PMID: 15224851
-
Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):609-14. doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318043014c. Otol Neurotol. 2007. PMID: 17514064
-
Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of long-term hearing preservation.Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:49-56. doi: 10.1159/000095614. Epub 2006 Oct 6. Audiol Neurootol. 2006. PMID: 17063011
-
Partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS).Cochlear Implants Int. 2010 Jun;11 Suppl 1:56-66. doi: 10.1179/146701010X12671178390870. Cochlear Implants Int. 2010. PMID: 21756584 Review.
-
Outcomes review of modern hearing preservation technique in cochlear implant.Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016 Oct;43(5):485-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Mar 11. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016. PMID: 26976547 Review.
Cited by
-
[Transplantation of neural stem cells into the cochlea].HNO. 2007 Nov;55(11):862-70. doi: 10.1007/s00106-007-1538-4. HNO. 2007. PMID: 17487462 German.
-
THE PSYCHOPHYSICS OF LOW-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC HEARING IN ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION (EAS) AND BIMODAL PATIENTS.J Hear Sci. 2012 May 1;2(2):33-44. J Hear Sci. 2012. PMID: 24244874 Free PMC article.
-
[Present state of cochlear implant treatment in adults and children].HNO. 2009 Jul;57(7):693-706. doi: 10.1007/s00106-009-1959-3. HNO. 2009. PMID: 19590841 German.
-
Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array.J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Oct;124(4):2164-73. doi: 10.1121/1.2967842. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008. PMID: 19062856 Free PMC article.
-
Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation.Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:51-60. doi: 10.1159/000262596. Epub 2009 Nov 25. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010. PMID: 19955721 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources