Frequency and management of recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stent implantation
- PMID: 15658093
- DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.1.0029
Frequency and management of recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stent implantation
Abstract
Object: To determine the rate of hemodynamically significant recurrent carotid artery (CA) stenosis after stent-assisted angioplasty for CA occlusive disease, the authors analyzed Doppler ultrasonography data that had been prospectively collected between October 1998 and September 2002 for CA stent trials.
Methods: Patients included in the study participated in at least 6 months of follow-up review with serial Doppler studies or were found to have elevated in-stent velocities (> 300 cm/second) on postprocedure Doppler ultrasonograms. Hemodynamically significant (> or = 80%) recurrent stenosis was identified using the following Doppler criteria: peak in-stent systolic velocity at least 330 cm/second, peak in-stent diastolic velocity at least 130 cm/second, and peak internal carotid artery/common carotid artery velocity ratio at least 3.8. Follow-up studies were obtained at approximate fixed intervals of 1 day, 1 month, 6 months, and yearly. Angiography was performed in the event of recurrent symptoms, evidence of hemodynamically significant stenosis on Doppler ultrasonography, or both. Treatment was repeated because of symptoms, angiographic evidence of severe (> or = 80%) recurrent stenosis, or both of these. Stents were implanted in 142 vessels in 138 patients (all but five patients were considered high-risk surgical candidates and 25 patients were lost to follow-up review). For the remaining 112 patients (117 vessels), the mean duration of Doppler ultrasonography follow up was 16.42+/-10.58 months (range 4-54 months). Using one or more Doppler criteria, severe (> or = 80%) in-stent stenosis was detected in six patients (5%). Eight patients underwent repeated angiography. Six patients (three with symptoms) required repeated intervention (in four patients angioplasty alone; in one patient conventional angioplasty plus Cutting Balloon angioplasty; and in one patient stent-assisted angioplasty).
Conclusions: In a subset of primarily high-risk surgical candidates treated with stent-assisted angioplasty, the rates of hemodynamically significant restenosis were comparable to surgical restenosis rates cited in previously published works. Treatment for recurrent stenosis incurred no instance of periprocedure neurological morbidity.
Similar articles
-
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040. J Vasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16476606
-
Follow-up of stented carotid arteries by Doppler ultrasound.Neurosurgery. 2002 Sep;51(3):639-43; discussion 643. Neurosurgery. 2002. PMID: 12188941
-
Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038. J Vasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18178455
-
Percutaneous Treatment of Recurrent In-Stent Restenosis of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Case Report and State-of-the-Art Review.Am J Case Rep. 2015 Aug 21;16:558-62. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.894198. Am J Case Rep. 2015. PMID: 26294661 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Refractory in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting: a case report and review of operative management.Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009 Jun-Jul;43(3):306-11. doi: 10.1177/1538574408327572. Epub 2009 Jan 8. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009. PMID: 19131368 Review.
Cited by
-
Carotid artery interventions for restenosis after prior stenting: is it different from interventions of de novo lesions? Results from the carotid artery stent (CAS)--registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Dec;99(12):809-15. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0188-9. Epub 2010 Jul 2. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20596714
-
Cerebral artery restenosis following transluminal balloon angioplasty for vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage.Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:43. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.79758. Epub 2011 Apr 19. Surg Neurol Int. 2011. PMID: 21660269 Free PMC article.
-
The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review.Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1272. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-963. Ann Transl Med. 2020. PMID: 33178804 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Overlap stenting for in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting.Nagoya J Med Sci. 2016 May;78(2):143-9. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27303101 Free PMC article.
-
Complication rate in unprotected carotid artery stenting with closed-cell stents.Neuroradiology. 2010 Jul;52(7):611-8. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0672-y. Epub 2010 Mar 23. Neuroradiology. 2010. PMID: 20309532
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources