Validation of a simple automated movement detection system for formalin test in rats
- PMID: 15659112
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2005.00001.x
Validation of a simple automated movement detection system for formalin test in rats
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the validity and sensitivity of an automatic movement detection system developed by our laboratory for the formalin test in rats.
Methods: The effects of systemic morphine and local anesthetic lidocaine on the nociceptive behaviors induced by formalin subcutaneously injected into the hindpaw were examined by using an automated movement detection system and manual measuring methods.
Results: Formalin subcutaneously injected into the hindpaw produced typical biphasic nociceptive behaviors (agitation). The mean agitation event rate during a 60-min observation period increased linearly following increases in the formalin concentration (0.0%, 0.5%, 1.5%, 2.5%, and 5%, 50 microL). Systemic application of morphine of different doses (1, 2, and 5 mg/kg) 10-min prior to formalin injection depressed the agitation responses induced by formalin injection in a dose-dependent manner, and the antinociceptive effect induced by the largest dose (5 mg/kg) of morphine was significantly antagonized by systemic application of the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1.25 mg/kg). Local anesthetic lidocaine (20 mg/kg) injected into the ipsilateral ankle subskin 5-min prior to formalin completely blocked the agitation response to formalin injection. These results were comparable to those obtained from manual measure of the incidence of flinching or the duration time of licking/biting of the injected paw.
Conclusion: These data suggest that this automated movement detection system for formalin test is a simple, validated measure with good pharmacological sensitivity suitable for discovering novel analgesics or investigating central pain mechanisms.
Similar articles
-
Mu but not delta and kappa opioid receptor involvement in ventrolateral orbital cortex opioid-evoked antinociception in formalin test rats.Neuroscience. 2004;126(3):717-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.04.013. Neuroscience. 2004. PMID: 15183520
-
A novel automated method for measuring the effect of analgesics on formalin-evoked licking behavior in rats.J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Jan 30;167(2):167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Aug 12. J Neurosci Methods. 2008. PMID: 17881061
-
A new formalin test allowing simultaneous evaluation of cardiovascular and nociceptive responses.Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1997 Oct-Nov;75(10-11):1203-11. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1997. PMID: 9431444
-
The orofacial formalin test.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Apr;28(2):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.12.003. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004. PMID: 15172765 Review.
-
Refinement of pain evaluation techniques. The formalin test.Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2004;40(2):223-9. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2004. PMID: 15536274 Review.
Cited by
-
Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase in the anterior cingulate cortex contributes to the induction and expression of affective pain.J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 11;29(10):3307-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4300-08.2009. J Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19279268 Free PMC article.
-
Analgesic activity of the ethanolic extract of Shorea robusta resin in experimental animals.Indian J Pharmacol. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(4):493-9. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.99322. Indian J Pharmacol. 2012. PMID: 23087512 Free PMC article.
-
Machine learning-based automated phenotyping of inflammatory nocifensive behavior in mice.Mol Pain. 2020 Jan-Dec;16:1744806920958596. doi: 10.1177/1744806920958596. Mol Pain. 2020. PMID: 32955381 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing complex movement behaviors in rodent models of neurological disorders.Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019 Nov;165:106817. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.02.025. Epub 2018 Feb 21. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019. PMID: 29476821 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources