Outcome following stabilization of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures
- PMID: 15660069
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.03.021
Outcome following stabilization of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures
Abstract
We present results of internal stabilization of 16 type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures following total or hemiarthroplasty of the hip. Seven patients had cemented stems, and the rest had cementless, extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stems. Fourteen were managed by a cable-grip plating system, 1 by Dynamic compression plate, and 1 had insertion of cables only. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Four patients had a major complication: 2 had deep infection; 1 had nonunion requiring amputation; and 1 had persistent hip pain requiring removal of all metalwork, including the hip prosthesis. The average time to healing in the remaining patients was 16.3 weeks. Harris Hip Scores dropped from an average of 86.8 preoperatively to 73.4 on last follow-up. Periprosthetic fractures are a significant injury, with a high risk of complications.
Similar articles
-
Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with a first generation locking plate.Injury. 2007 Aug;38(8):965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.026. Epub 2007 Jun 11. Injury. 2007. PMID: 17561020
-
Locking plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver Type B1 and Type C periprosthetic fractures of femur: a report on 12 patients.Injury. 2007 Jun;38(6):725-33. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.038. Epub 2007 May 2. Injury. 2007. PMID: 17477923
-
Less invasive stabilisation system (LISS) for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: a 3-year follow-up.Injury. 2008 Apr;39(4):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.10.034. Epub 2008 Mar 5. Injury. 2008. PMID: 18321509
-
Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty: treatment and results to date.Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:243-9. Instr Course Lect. 1998. PMID: 9571425 Review. No abstract available.
-
Periprosthetic fractures of the femur.Orthopedics. 2009 Sep;32(9):orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=42835. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090728-11. Orthopedics. 2009. PMID: 19751016 Review.
Cited by
-
[Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum and femur : Causes-classification-treatment algorithms].Orthopade. 2019 Apr;48(4):322-329. doi: 10.1007/s00132-019-03696-8. Orthopade. 2019. PMID: 30820591 Review. German.
-
Optimal configuration of a three-rod ortho-bridge system in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: A finite element analysis.J Orthop. 2022 Feb 26;30:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.02.020. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr. J Orthop. 2022. PMID: 35280449 Free PMC article.
-
Correlations between Vancouver type of periprosthetic femur fracture and treatment outcomes.J Orthop. 2019 May 27;16(6):517-521. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.05.011. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec. J Orthop. 2019. PMID: 31680744 Free PMC article.
-
Periprosthetic Fractures About the Hip: A Case-Matched Retrospective Analysis of Functional Outcomes Postrehabilitation.Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015 Sep;6(3):147-52. doi: 10.1177/2151458515580640. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 26328227 Free PMC article.
-
Periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem: overcoming challenges and avoiding pitfalls.Ann Transl Med. 2015 Sep;3(16):234. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.09.32. Ann Transl Med. 2015. PMID: 26539451 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous