Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous posterior perineal lacerations during vaginal birth
- PMID: 15660183
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-004-1273-2
Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous posterior perineal lacerations during vaginal birth
Abstract
The objective of this study was to measure the length of episiotomy or spontaneous posterior perineal laceration and their relationship to perineal measurements and obstetric variables. The length of the perineum and genital hiatus and vertical length of episiotomy or posterior perineal tears were measured in 114 consecutive parturients with spontaneous singleton term deliveries. Seventy-four (65%) women underwent episiotomy while 40 (35%) sustained spontaneous posterior tears. Perineal or genital hiatus length was significantly correlated to episiotomy (r=0.34, p=0.003) or laceration (r=0.37, p=0.02) length, respectively. This association was significant (p=0.001) in a generalized linear model with duration of second stage of labor (p=0.005), degree of tear (p=0), and parity (p=0). Perineal length was significantly related to maternal age (p=0.036) and weight (p=0.037) and hiatal length (p=0). Short perineum and genital hiatus, long second stage of labor, and low parity are associated with longer posterior perineal injury.
Similar articles
-
Perineal lacerations during spontaneous vaginal delivery.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2001 Oct 15;113(19):743-6. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2001. PMID: 11715753
-
[The perineal body length and injury at delivery].Ceska Gynekol. 2005 Sep;70(5):355-61. Ceska Gynekol. 2005. PMID: 16180795 Czech.
-
Length of the second stage of labor as a predictor of perineal outcome after vaginal delivery.J Reprod Med. 2006 Feb;51(2):115-9. J Reprod Med. 2006. PMID: 16572912
-
[Episiotomy and prevention of perineal and pelvic floor injuries].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006 Feb;35(1 Suppl):1S24-1S31. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006. PMID: 16495824 French.
-
Anatomy and physiology of the female perineal body with relevance to obstetrical injury and repair.Clin Anat. 2002 Aug;15(5):321-34. doi: 10.1002/ca.10034. Clin Anat. 2002. PMID: 12203375 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom.Int J Womens Health. 2015 Dec 9;7:949-55. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S94680. eCollection 2015. Int J Womens Health. 2015. PMID: 26677344 Free PMC article.
-
Episiotomy in modern clinical practice: friend or foe?Int Urogynecol J. 2019 May;30(5):669-671. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03912-1. Epub 2019 Mar 13. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 30868195
-
New approach to the evaluation of perineal measurements to predict the likelihood of the need for an episiotomy.Int Urogynecol J. 2019 May;30(5):815-821. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3745-9. Epub 2018 Aug 23. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 30140939
-
Minimizing the risk of childbirth-induced pelvic floor dysfunctions in the developing world: "preventive" urogynecology.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Jun;20(6):615-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0891-0. Epub 2009 Apr 28. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009. PMID: 19399354 No abstract available.
-
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1725-34. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2747-0. Epub 2015 Jun 5. Int Urogynecol J. 2015. PMID: 26044511 Review.