Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Sep-Oct;16(5):395-400.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1273-2. Epub 2005 Jan 20.

Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous posterior perineal lacerations during vaginal birth

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous posterior perineal lacerations during vaginal birth

Diaa E E Rizk et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to measure the length of episiotomy or spontaneous posterior perineal laceration and their relationship to perineal measurements and obstetric variables. The length of the perineum and genital hiatus and vertical length of episiotomy or posterior perineal tears were measured in 114 consecutive parturients with spontaneous singleton term deliveries. Seventy-four (65%) women underwent episiotomy while 40 (35%) sustained spontaneous posterior tears. Perineal or genital hiatus length was significantly correlated to episiotomy (r=0.34, p=0.003) or laceration (r=0.37, p=0.02) length, respectively. This association was significant (p=0.001) in a generalized linear model with duration of second stage of labor (p=0.005), degree of tear (p=0), and parity (p=0). Perineal length was significantly related to maternal age (p=0.036) and weight (p=0.037) and hiatal length (p=0). Short perineum and genital hiatus, long second stage of labor, and low parity are associated with longer posterior perineal injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Mar;95(3):464-71 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Dec;177(6):1345-53; discussion 1353-5 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;98(2):225-30 - PubMed
    1. J Reprod Med. 2001 Aug;46(8):752-6 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jan;47(1):24-34 - PubMed

Publication types