Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004;141(2):97-105.
doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01803.x.

The incidence of aneuploidy in human oocytes assessed by conventional cytogenetic analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Review

The incidence of aneuploidy in human oocytes assessed by conventional cytogenetic analysis

Bernd Rosenbusch. Hereditas. 2004.
Free article

Abstract

Human oocytes failing to fertilize during assisted reproduction are an important source of information for assessing incidence and causal mechanisms of maternal aneuploidy. This review describes the techniques of conventional oocyte chromosome analysis and evaluates the results of 59 studies comprising a total of>10,000 female gametes. The mean rate of aneuploidy (hypohaploidy + hyperhaploidy) amounts to approximately 20%, but this incidence is reduced as soon as possible artifacts introduced by the fixation technique are taken into consideration. It is therefore concluded that a realistic value for numerical abnormalities arising during first meiotic division lies between 12 and 15%. All chromosome groups are affected by aneuploidy but the actually observed frequencies exceed the expected frequencies in groups D, E, and G. Two aneuploidy-causing mechanisms have been identified in human oocytes: nondisjunction, resulting in the loss or gain of whole chromosomes, and predivision, resulting in the loss or gain of single chromatids. A brief analysis including only aneuploid complements with one extra or missing chromosome/chromatid shows a slight increase in predivision (52.9%) compared with nondisjunction (47.1%). Finally, suggestions for future studies are given since, for instance, the presentation of results and the use of cytogenetic nomenclature have not been uniform.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources