Evaluation of endocervical, first-void urine and self-administered vulval swabs for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a miscarriage population
- PMID: 15663407
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00322.x
Evaluation of endocervical, first-void urine and self-administered vulval swabs for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a miscarriage population
Erratum in
- BJOG. 2005 Apr;112(4):528
Abstract
Objective: To compare, in parallel, different approaches of opportunistically screening women with bleeding in early pregnancy for Chlamydia trachomatis.
Design: Prospective observational [corrected] study.
Setting: Early pregnancy assessment unit, University hospital, Scotland, UK.
Population: Over 200 consecutive women admitted to an early pregnancy assessment unit were recruited. All had a positive pregnancy test, a history of vaginal bleeding and were less than 24 weeks of gestation. Women with recent antibiotic use, heavy vaginal bleeding and cervical shock excluded.
Methods: Each women provided two or more of the following specimens: a self-administered vulval swab, first-void urine and/or endocervical swab. Following screening, each completed a semi-structured questionnaire assessing the acceptability of each method undertaken.
Main outcome measure: Subjective rating of the screening methods; prevalence; method performance, including proportion requiring repeat testing.
Results: The majority accepted screening, with moderate prevalence rates (95% CI) 3.9% (2.0-7.4%) identified. All positive women were less than 30 years of age. Parallel screening exposed the potential of reduced test performance with urine. Non-invasive sampling was more acceptable, but more likely to require repeat testing.
Conclusion: Both acceptability and the effect of bleeding on test performance need further assessment before a particular specimen can be recommended for screening this population of women for C. trachomatis.
Similar articles
-
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in early pregnancy using self-administered vaginal swabs and first pass urines: a cross-sectional community-based survey.Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Oct;52(483):830-2. Br J Gen Pract. 2002. PMID: 12392124 Free PMC article.
-
Preference among female Army recruits for use of self-administrated vaginal swabs or urine to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections.Sex Transm Dis. 2003 Oct;30(10):769-73. doi: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000079048.11771.46. Sex Transm Dis. 2003. PMID: 14520176
-
An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.BJOG. 2004 Nov;111(11):1261-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00324.x. BJOG. 2004. PMID: 15521872
-
[No firm evidence for screening for Chlamydia in connection with spontaneous abortion].Ugeskr Laeger. 2013 Feb 4;175(6):354-7. Ugeskr Laeger. 2013. PMID: 23402242 Review. Danish.
-
Vaginal self-sampling as a diagnosis tool in low-income countries and potential applications for exploring the infectious causes of miscarriage.Future Microbiol. 2017 Jun;12:609-620. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2016-0179. Epub 2017 Jun 12. Future Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 28604063 Review.
Cited by
-
Acceptability, feasibility, equity and resource use for prenatal screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea: A systematic review.Can Commun Dis Rep. 2024 Jul 24;50(7-8):250-258. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v50i78a03. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2024. PMID: 39170589 Free PMC article.
-
Young pregnant women's views on the acceptability of screening for chlamydia as part of routine antenatal care.BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 19;10:505. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-505. BMC Public Health. 2010. PMID: 20723264 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical