Intra-individual comparison of patient acceptability of multidetector-row CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema
- PMID: 15664575
- DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2004.07.006
Intra-individual comparison of patient acceptability of multidetector-row CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema
Abstract
Aims: To compare the subjective acceptability of CT colonography in comparison with barium enema in older symptomatic patients, and to ascertain preferences for future colonic investigation.
Materials and methods: The study population comprised 78 persons aged 60 years or over with symptoms suggestive of colorectal neoplasia, who underwent CT colonography followed the same day by barium enema. A 25-point questionnaire was administered after each procedure and an additional follow-up questionnaire a week later. Responses were compared using Wilcoxon matched pairs testing, Mann-Whitney test statistics and binomial exact testing.
Results: Participants suffered less physical discomfort during CT colonography (p = 0.03) and overall satisfaction was greater compared with barium enema (p = 0.03). On follow-up, respondents reported significantly better tolerance of CT colonography (p = 0.002), and were less prepared to undergo barium enema again (p < 0.001). Of 52 subjects expressing an opinion, all preferred CT to barium enema.
Conclusion: Patient satisfaction was higher with CT colonography than barium enema. CT colonography caused significantly less physical discomfort and was overwhelmingly preferred by patients.
Similar articles
-
Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Oct;181(4):913-21. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.4.1810913. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003. PMID: 14500202
-
Comparison of radiologists' confidence in excluding significant colorectal neoplasia with multidetector-row CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema.Br J Radiol. 2006 Mar;79(939):208-15. doi: 10.1259/bjr/99126323. Br J Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16498032
-
Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy.Am J Med. 2007 Mar;120(3):203-210.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.05.061. Am J Med. 2007. PMID: 17349438 Review.
-
Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences.Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):378-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272020293. Radiology. 2003. PMID: 12732696
-
Is there still a role for double-contrast barium enema examination?Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Apr;6(4):389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.051. Epub 2008 Mar 5. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008. PMID: 18321788 Review.
Cited by
-
Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media.Br J Radiol. 2013 May;86(1025):20120636. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120636. Br J Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23564884 Free PMC article.
-
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography.Eur Radiol. 2007 Feb;17(2):575-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0407-y. Eur Radiol. 2007. PMID: 16967260
-
Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):1085-92. doi: 10.1259/bjr/22421731. Epub 2012 Mar 14. Br J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22422379 Free PMC article.
-
Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment.Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1146-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.07.012. Value Health. 2011. PMID: 22152186 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources