Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Jan 20;125(2):167-9.

[Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia before and after introduction of laser conization]

[Article in Norwegian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 15665889
Free article
Comparative Study

[Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia before and after introduction of laser conization]

[Article in Norwegian]
Kåre Nordland et al. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is an established precursor of invasive cervical cancer. Excision procedures such as cold-knife conization, electrodiathermy or laser conization of the cervix are major surgical treatment modalities of CIN.

Material and methods: Women who were treated for CIN 2/3 or suspected invasive cancer with cold-knife conization between 1977 and 1980 (n=212) were compared with women treated with laser conization between 1987 and 1990 (n=439). Outcome parameters were method of anaesthesia, duration of hospital stay, treatment efficacy and postoperative complications such as bleeding, infection or cervical stenosis.

Results: General anaesthesia was used in 88 % of women treated with cold-knife conization, while paracervical block anaesthesia was used in 97 % of women treated with laser conization. Mean hospital stay was 7.6 days after cold-knife conization, while laser conization was performed as an outpatient procedure. The overall complication rate was 36.8 % after cold-knife conization and 8.4 % after laser conization. Significantly higher rates of postoperative bleeding (21.1 % v. 5.0 %), infections (2.6 % v. 0.5 %) and cervical stenosis (11.8 % v. 1.6 %) were found after cold-knife conization compared to laser conization. Treatment efficacy was equally high (98 %) with both methods.

Conclusion: Laser conization was found to be a significantly less resource consuming procedure and with fewer postoperative complications compared to cold-knife conization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles