[Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia before and after introduction of laser conization]
- PMID: 15665889
[Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia before and after introduction of laser conization]
Abstract
Background: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is an established precursor of invasive cervical cancer. Excision procedures such as cold-knife conization, electrodiathermy or laser conization of the cervix are major surgical treatment modalities of CIN.
Material and methods: Women who were treated for CIN 2/3 or suspected invasive cancer with cold-knife conization between 1977 and 1980 (n=212) were compared with women treated with laser conization between 1987 and 1990 (n=439). Outcome parameters were method of anaesthesia, duration of hospital stay, treatment efficacy and postoperative complications such as bleeding, infection or cervical stenosis.
Results: General anaesthesia was used in 88 % of women treated with cold-knife conization, while paracervical block anaesthesia was used in 97 % of women treated with laser conization. Mean hospital stay was 7.6 days after cold-knife conization, while laser conization was performed as an outpatient procedure. The overall complication rate was 36.8 % after cold-knife conization and 8.4 % after laser conization. Significantly higher rates of postoperative bleeding (21.1 % v. 5.0 %), infections (2.6 % v. 0.5 %) and cervical stenosis (11.8 % v. 1.6 %) were found after cold-knife conization compared to laser conization. Treatment efficacy was equally high (98 %) with both methods.
Conclusion: Laser conization was found to be a significantly less resource consuming procedure and with fewer postoperative complications compared to cold-knife conization.
Similar articles
-
Cold knife conization and loop excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Tumori. 1999 Jul-Aug;85(4):243-6. doi: 10.1177/030089169908500406. Tumori. 1999. PMID: 10587025 Clinical Trial.
-
Cold-knife conization versus photodynamic therapy with topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II with associated human papillomavirus infection: a comparison of preliminary results.Anticancer Res. 2003 Mar-Apr;23(2C):1785-8. Anticancer Res. 2003. PMID: 12820459
-
Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Feb 10;106(2):214-8. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00245-2. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003. PMID: 12551795 Clinical Trial.
-
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;132(3):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Nov 28. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016. PMID: 26643302 Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review.Rev Saude Publica. 2020 Mar 16;54:27. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001750. eCollection 2020. Rev Saude Publica. 2020. PMID: 32187314 Free PMC article.