Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Feb 18;44(9):1401-4.
doi: 10.1002/anie.200462114.

Recognizing a single base in an individual DNA strand: a step toward DNA sequencing in nanopores

Affiliations

Recognizing a single base in an individual DNA strand: a step toward DNA sequencing in nanopores

Nurit Ashkenasy et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

Functional supramolecular chemistry at the single-molecule level. Single strands of DNA can be captured inside α-hemolysin transmembrane pore protein to form single-species α-HL·DNA pseudorotaxanes. This process can be used to identify a single adenine nucleotide at a specific location on a strand of DNA by the characteristic reductions in the α-HL ion conductance. This study suggests that α-HL-mediated single-molecule DNA sequencing might be fundamentally feasible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a) Schematic representation of the single-species α– HL·DNA pseudorotaxane formation. By employing sequences with a long ss-DNA segment having a hairpin structure at one end, the SS-DNA can thread the pore under positive applied potentials and held stably in a pseudorotaxane configuration by the interactions of the DNA duplex segment at the pore entrance. The heptameric transmembrane pore structure is depicted in a cutaway side view. b) Ion conductance blockades caused by capture of poly d(A) and poly d(C) single strands (sequences 1 and 2, respectively). The typical events shown are from ion conductance traces recorded at +170 mV when the thread molecules (1 μM) were added to the cis chamber. Traces were recorded under symmetrical conditions (500 mM KCl, 5 mM MOPS pH 7.5), Bessel filtered at 5 kHz, and sampled at 200 μs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The averaged residual currents for various α-HL·DNA pseudorotaxanes measured at +170 mV. The left panel depicts the percent residual currents measured for poly d(A) and poly d(C) threads in two topoisomeric α-HL·DNA pseudorotaxane configurations. Note that when the α-HL pore is threaded with a homopolymeric DNA segment either from the free 3’-terminus (1 or 2) or from 5’-terminus (3 or 4), similar characteristic A-type or C-type ion channel blockades are observed. The right panel depicts the observed residual currents for α-HL·DNA pseudorotaxanes prepared using four different ss-DNA block copolymer threads (5–6). The region of the ss-DNA segment recognized by the α-HL channel (10 to 20 nucleotides away from the edge of the hairpin segment) is marked by the gray rectangle. For clarity A-type and C-type residual currents are shown as black and gray bars, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percent probability of the A-type (IR < 27%) and the C-type (IR > 27%) residual currents for single deoxyadenosine-substituted poly d(C) DNA strands captured inside the α-HL pore as a pseudorotaxane. Percent probability was calculated by the number of A-type or C-type events measured at +170 mV divided by the total number of events (n) recorded for a given strand (n = 11, 21, 22, 32, 22, and 14 for strands 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, respectively). The percent probability of A-type and C-type events for each strand are given as black and gray bars respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percent probability of the A-type and the C-type events for single deoxyadenosine-substituted poly d(C) DNA hairpins sequences having either 13- or 10-basepair stem duplexes (strands 1415, and 16–18, respectively) measured at +170 mV (n = 43, 44, 69, 35, 66 for 1418, respectively). For clarity the A-type (IR < 27%) and C-type (IR > 27%) events are shown as black and grey bars, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Song L, Hobaugh MR, Shustak C, Cheley S, Bayley H, Gouaux JE. Science. 1996;274:1859. - PubMed
    1. Kasianowicz JJ, Brandin E, Branton D, Deamer DW. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:13770. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Akeson M, Branton D, Kasianowicz JJ, Brandin E, Deamer DW. Biophys J. 1999;77:3227. - PMC - PubMed
    3. Meller A, Nivon L, Brandin E, Golovchenko J, Branton D. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:1079. - PMC - PubMed
    4. Howorka S, Cheley S, Bayley H. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:636. - PubMed
    1. Bayley H, Martin CR. Chem Rev. 2000;100:2575. - PubMed
    2. Deamer DW, Akeson M. TIBTECH. 2000;18:147. - PubMed
    3. Deamer DW, Branton D. Acc Chem Res. 2002;35:817–825. - PubMed
    4. Nakane JJ, Akeson M, Marziali A. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2003;15:R1365.
    1. Jirage KB, Hulteen JC, Martin CR. Science. 1997;278:655.
    2. Schmidt C, Mayer M, Vogel H. Angew Chem. 2000;112:3267. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3137. - PubMed
    3. Li J, Stein D, McMullan C, Branton D, Aziz MJ, Golovchenko JA. Nature. 2001;412:166. - PubMed
    4. Bayley H, Cremer PS. Nature. 2001;413:226. - PubMed
    5. Chen P, Mitsui T, Farmer DB, Golovchenko J, Gordon RG, Branton D. Nano Lett. 2004;4:1333. - PMC - PubMed
    6. Chang H, Kosari F, Andreadakis G, Alam MA, Vasmatzis G, Bashir R. Nano Lett. 2004;4:1551.
    1. Sauer-Budge AF, Nyamwanda JA, Lubensky DK, Branton D. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;90:238101. - PubMed
    2. Sanchez-Quesada J, Saghatelian A, Cheley S, Bayley H, Ghadiri MR. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:3063. Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 3125. - PMC - PubMed
    3. Nakane J, Wiggin M, Marziali A. Biophys J. 2004;87:615. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources