Diagnostic work-up of rectal bleeding in general practice
- PMID: 15667760
- PMCID: PMC1266237
Diagnostic work-up of rectal bleeding in general practice
Abstract
Background: GPs have many patients with gastrointestinal discomfort. Among bowel-related complaints, the sign of rectal bleeding is of particular importance in patients aged 50 years and above, as it can be an early sign for serious bowel diseases such as colon carcinoma. Despite many guidelines offered to GPs for screening and early detection of colorectal carcinomas, there is very little information about the actual diagnostic approach to the sign of rectal bleeding.
Aim: The aim of the study was to collect data concerning treatment strategies used by GPs who treat patients presenting with rectal bleeding.
Design of study: Prospective data collection.
Setting: General practices in Germany.
Method: Over the course of a year, GPs recorded their treatment strategies in patients presenting with rectal bleeding and associated symptoms. Using a digital practice patient file, physicians participating in the study were able to continuously transmit data electronically to the researchers of the study about diagnostics, referrals, hospital admissions, and final diagnoses.
Results: During the course of 1 year, 94 participating physicians collected data on 1584 patients. Information about treating rectal bleeding was recorded for 422 patients; 60% of the patients were referred to specialists in internal medicine or gastroenterologists for further diagnostics. A colonoscopy was the most frequently performed diagnostic procedure (46.2%). Twenty-two per cent (n = 93) of the patients--54 of them aged 50 years and above--were exclusively treated by their GP without conducting a colonoscopy or cooperating with specialists. For these patients, GPs diagnosed less severe diseases like haemorrhoids or other proctologic diseases.
Conclusion: By using a study that allows GPs to transmit electronically their findings and data, it is possible to draw a picture of treatment strategies of GPs in patients presenting with rectal bleeding. The high percentage of patients who received medical treatment in consultation with specialists underscores the significance of the sign of rectal bleeding in general practice. The need for further diagnostic measures in patients who have been treated exclusively by GPs has to be discussed.
Similar articles
-
Factors identifying higher risk rectal bleeding in general practice.Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Dec;55(521):949-55. Br J Gen Pract. 2005. PMID: 16378565 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and causes of rectal bleeding in general practice as detected by colonoscopy.Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Mar;46(404):161-4. Br J Gen Pract. 1996. PMID: 8731622 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic yield of colorectal neoplasia with colonoscopy for abdominal pain, change in bowel habits, and rectal bleeding.Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Aug;88(8):1179-83. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993. PMID: 8338084
-
Rectal bleeding.Aust Fam Physician. 2000 Sep;29(9):829-33. Aust Fam Physician. 2000. PMID: 11008384 Review.
-
The management of rectal bleeding.Br J Clin Pract. 1993 May-Jun;47(3):155-8. Br J Clin Pract. 1993. PMID: 8347443 Review.
Cited by
-
Rectal bleeding and prolapse… not always benign diseases rather anal cancer. The importance of a correct decision making since primary care.G Chir. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):133-135. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2016.37.3.133. G Chir. 2016. PMID: 27734798 Free PMC article.
-
Positive predictive values of ≥5% in primary care for cancer: systematic review.Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Sep;60(578):e366-77. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X515412. Br J Gen Pract. 2010. PMID: 20849687 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy systematic review of rectal bleeding in combination with other symptoms, signs and tests in relation to colorectal cancer.Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan 5;102(1):48-58. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605426. Epub 2009 Nov 24. Br J Cancer. 2010. PMID: 19935790 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Gastrointestinal Disorders in Central and Eastern Europe: Self-Reported Practice of Primary Care Physicians.Zdr Varst. 2014 Dec;53(4):294-303. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2014-0032. Epub 2014 Oct 15. Zdr Varst. 2014. PMID: 27669515 Free PMC article.
-
Critical items for assessing risk of lung and colorectal cancer in primary care: a Delphi study.Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Aug;64(625):e509-15. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X681001. Br J Gen Pract. 2014. PMID: 25071064 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Agregeus L. The epidemiology of abdominal symptoms: prevalence and demographic characteristics in a Swedish adult population. a report from the abdominal symptom study. J Gend Specif Med. 1994;29:102–109. - PubMed
-
- Fijten GH, et al. The incidence and outcome of rectal bleeding in general practice. Fam Pract. 1993;10:283–287. - PubMed
-
- Mandel JS, et al. Reducting mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;228:1365–1371. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials