Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan;55(510):14-9; discussion 18.

Diagnostic work-up of rectal bleeding in general practice

Affiliations

Diagnostic work-up of rectal bleeding in general practice

Christoph Heintze et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Jan.

Abstract

Background: GPs have many patients with gastrointestinal discomfort. Among bowel-related complaints, the sign of rectal bleeding is of particular importance in patients aged 50 years and above, as it can be an early sign for serious bowel diseases such as colon carcinoma. Despite many guidelines offered to GPs for screening and early detection of colorectal carcinomas, there is very little information about the actual diagnostic approach to the sign of rectal bleeding.

Aim: The aim of the study was to collect data concerning treatment strategies used by GPs who treat patients presenting with rectal bleeding.

Design of study: Prospective data collection.

Setting: General practices in Germany.

Method: Over the course of a year, GPs recorded their treatment strategies in patients presenting with rectal bleeding and associated symptoms. Using a digital practice patient file, physicians participating in the study were able to continuously transmit data electronically to the researchers of the study about diagnostics, referrals, hospital admissions, and final diagnoses.

Results: During the course of 1 year, 94 participating physicians collected data on 1584 patients. Information about treating rectal bleeding was recorded for 422 patients; 60% of the patients were referred to specialists in internal medicine or gastroenterologists for further diagnostics. A colonoscopy was the most frequently performed diagnostic procedure (46.2%). Twenty-two per cent (n = 93) of the patients--54 of them aged 50 years and above--were exclusively treated by their GP without conducting a colonoscopy or cooperating with specialists. For these patients, GPs diagnosed less severe diseases like haemorrhoids or other proctologic diseases.

Conclusion: By using a study that allows GPs to transmit electronically their findings and data, it is possible to draw a picture of treatment strategies of GPs in patients presenting with rectal bleeding. The high percentage of patients who received medical treatment in consultation with specialists underscores the significance of the sign of rectal bleeding in general practice. The need for further diagnostic measures in patients who have been treated exclusively by GPs has to be discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agregeus L. The epidemiology of abdominal symptoms: prevalence and demographic characteristics in a Swedish adult population. a report from the abdominal symptom study. J Gend Specif Med. 1994;29:102–109. - PubMed
    1. Metcalf JV. Incidence and causes of rectal bleeding in general practice as detected by colonoscopy. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46:161–164. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crosland A. Rectal bleeding: prevalence and consultation behaviour. BMJ. 1995;311:486–488. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fijten GH, et al. The incidence and outcome of rectal bleeding in general practice. Fam Pract. 1993;10:283–287. - PubMed
    1. Mandel JS, et al. Reducting mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;228:1365–1371. - PubMed

Publication types