Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation
- PMID: 15668529
- DOI: 10.1159/000081887
Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation
Abstract
The aim of this report was to examine basal trauma in implanted human temporal bones and discuss modified approaches to the basal cochlear turn to avoid destruction of basal cochlear structures. Thirty-three human temporal bones were implanted with four different cochlear implant electrode arrays manufactured by MED-EL using either a caudal approach cochleostomy or round window membrane insertions. All specimens were processed with a special histological technique that allows sectioning of undecalcified bone with the electrode in situ. All bones were evaluated histologically in terms of basal cochlear trauma. Two pathomechanisms of basal trauma could be distinguished and were evaluated separately, buckling of the basal end of the array and trauma by drilling. Using the caudal approach cochleostomy, the total percentage of destructive basal trauma was 48% compared to less than 15% when performing round window membrane insertions. Although it is still unclear whether basal cochlear trauma influences apical cochlear function or not, adapted surgical procedures and no forceful insertion maneuvers should be used when performing cochlear implantations with hearing preservation.
Copyright (c) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study.Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 Sep;124(7):807-12. doi: 10.1080/00016480410018179. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004. PMID: 15370564
-
Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?Acta Otolaryngol. 2006 May;126(5):475-82. doi: 10.1080/00016480500437393. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16698696
-
Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:42-8. doi: 10.1159/000095613. Epub 2006 Oct 6. Audiol Neurootol. 2006. PMID: 17063010
-
Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation.Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 Aug;125(8):870-6. doi: 10.1080/00016480510031489. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005. PMID: 16158535 Review.
-
Cochlear implant electrode insertion: in defence of cochleostomy and factors against the round window membrane approach.Cochlear Implants Int. 2011 Aug;12 Suppl 2:S36-9. doi: 10.1179/146701011X13074645127478. Cochlear Implants Int. 2011. PMID: 21917217 Review.
Cited by
-
Optimal cochlear implant insertion vectors.Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jan;31(1):58-63. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181b76bb8. Otol Neurotol. 2010. PMID: 19707168 Free PMC article.
-
Residual low-frequency hearing after early device activation in cochlear implantation.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Sep;280(9):3977-3985. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07887-0. Epub 2023 Mar 21. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 36943438 Free PMC article.
-
Semiautomatic cochleostomy target and insertion trajectory planning for minimally invasive cochlear implantation.Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:596498. doi: 10.1155/2014/596498. Epub 2014 Jul 2. Biomed Res Int. 2014. PMID: 25101289 Free PMC article.
-
Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes.Int J Otolaryngol. 2013;2013:107186. doi: 10.1155/2013/107186. Epub 2013 Mar 17. Int J Otolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 23573094 Free PMC article.
-
Considerations and Rationale for Cochlear Implant Electrode Design - Past, Present and Future.J Int Adv Otol. 2018 Dec;14(3):382-391. doi: 10.5152/iao.2018.6372. J Int Adv Otol. 2018. PMID: 30644379 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical