Development and validation of a model to project the long-term benefit and cost of alternative lipid-lowering strategies in patients with hypercholesterolaemia
- PMID: 15669152
- DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200422003-00005
Development and validation of a model to project the long-term benefit and cost of alternative lipid-lowering strategies in patients with hypercholesterolaemia
Abstract
Introduction: Patients not currently reaching their lipid goals, even with the use of statins, are at elevated coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Ezetimibe, when coadministered with a patient's current statin, has been shown to effectively reduce cholesterol in patients with hypercholesterolaemia. In order to help healthcare decision makers assess the cost effectiveness of this treatment strategy, a model is needed to compare ezetimibe coadministration versus alternative statin titration strategies among patients who have failed to reach their lipid goal with their current statin dose.
Methods: A flexible decision-analytic model that projects the long-term benefit and cost of alternative lipid-lowering strategies is described. Using a Markov process, the model allows movement from one health state to another based on the predicted risk of CHD events (fatal and nonfatal) and the risk of death from non-CHD causes. Each health state can be assigned a quality-of-life weight and an expected cost in order to determine the total survival time, quality-adjusted survival time and cost associated with the alternative treatment strategies. The accuracy of the model in projecting the percentage of patients who experience fatal and nonfatal CHD events was assessed by using individual baseline patient characteristics from two long-term outcomes trials: the Air Force Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study, a primary prevention trial, and the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study, a secondary prevention trial.
Results: Compared with event rates in the two outcome trials, the model appears to underestimate both the absolute risk of nonfatal CHD events and its reduction due to lipid lowering. But the model appears to provide reasonable estimates of the absolute reduction in fatal CHD events following lipid treatment.
Discussion: The model will allow one to assess the cost effectiveness of alternative treatment strategies for hypercholesterolaemia including statin titration and the coadministration of ezetimibe in patients who have failed to reach their lipid goal with a statin. Because the benefit of reducing nonfatal CHD events may be underestimated, the model may overestimate the cost-effectiveness ratio of ezetimibe coadministration.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of ezetimibe coadministration in statin-treated patients not at cholesterol goal: application to Germany, Spain and Norway.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22 Suppl 3:49-61. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422003-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 15669153
-
Estimating the health benefits and costs associated with ezetimibe coadministered with statin therapy compared with higher dose statin monotherapy in patients with established cardiovascular disease: results of a Markov model for UK costs using data registries.Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1508-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.08.002. Clin Ther. 2008. PMID: 18803993
-
Projected cost-effectiveness of ezetimibe/simvastatin compared with doubling the statin dose in the United Kingdom: findings from the INFORCE study.Value Health. 2010 Sep-Oct;13(6):726-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00742.x. Epub 2010 Jun 7. Value Health. 2010. PMID: 20561328
-
Cost effectiveness of ezetimibe in patients with cardiovascular disease and statin intolerance or contraindications: a Markov model.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2008;8(6):419-27. doi: 10.2165/0129784-200808060-00005. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2008. PMID: 19159125
-
Reaching goal in hypercholesterolaemia: dual inhibition of cholesterol synthesis and absorption with simvastatin plus ezetimibe.Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Mar;22(3):511-28. doi: 10.1185/030079906X89856. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006. PMID: 16574035 Review.
Cited by
-
Economic evaluation of ezetimibe combined with simvastatin for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia.Neth Heart J. 2011 Feb;19(2):61-7. doi: 10.1007/s12471-010-0061-5. Neth Heart J. 2011. PMID: 22020943 Free PMC article.
-
Statin prescribing in Northern Ireland and England pre and post introduction of the quality and outcomes framework.Pharm World Sci. 2010 Feb;32(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s11096-009-9339-3. Epub 2009 Oct 31. Pharm World Sci. 2010. PMID: 19882233
-
Cost-Effectiveness of the CNIC-Polypill Strategy Compared With Separate Monocomponents in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease in Portugal: The MERCURY Study.J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2022 Nov 22;9(2):134-146. doi: 10.36469/001c.39768. eCollection 2022. J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2022. PMID: 36475278 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of extended-release niacin/laropiprant added to a stable simvastatin dose in secondary prevention patients not at cholesterol goal in Germany.Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Jun;13(3):365-74. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0309-z. Epub 2011 Apr 5. Eur J Health Econ. 2012. PMID: 21465286 Free PMC article.
-
Cost effectiveness of adding ezetimibe to atorvastatin therapy in patients not at cholesterol treatment goal in Canada.Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(8):815-30. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624080-00007. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006. PMID: 16898850
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical