Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan-Feb;3(1):82-5.
doi: 10.1370/afm.259.

The company we keep: why physicians should refuse to see pharmaceutical representatives

Affiliations

The company we keep: why physicians should refuse to see pharmaceutical representatives

Howard Brody. Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Whether physicians ought to interact with pharmaceutical sales representatives (reps) is a question worthy of careful ethical analysis. The issue presents a challenge to both professional integrity and time management. Empirical data suggest that interactions with pharmaceutical reps increase the chances that the physician will act contrary to duties owed to the patient. Ideally, a physician might both interact with reps and also do the research necessary to counteract the commercial bias in their messages. But a physician who actually did that research would, in turn, be devoting a good deal of time that might better be spent in other activities. The counterargument, that one is obligated to see representatives to obtain free samples to best serve one's patients, can be shown in most practice settings not to be compelling. Physicians ought to refuse to visit with representatives as a matter of both professional integrity and sensible time management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sebra J. Drug reps and doctors took an undeserved hit. Wall Street Journal. July 12, 2002: A9.
    1. Rothman DJ. Medical professionalism—focusing on the real issues. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1283–1286. - PubMed
    1. Schafer A. Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis-learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy. J Med Ethics. 2004;30:8–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Orlowski JP, Wateska L. The effects of pharmaceutical firm enticements on physician prescribing patterns. There’s no such thing as a free lunch. Chest. 1992;102:270–273. - PubMed
    1. Wazana A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA. 2000;283:373–380. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources