Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Feb;95(2):324-30.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.029413.

Comparative geographic concentrations of 4 sexually transmitted infections

Roxanne P Kerani  1 , Mark S Handcock, H Hunter Handsfield, King K Holmes
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative geographic concentrations of 4 sexually transmitted infections

Roxanne P Kerani et al. Am J Public Health. 2005 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: We measured and compared the concentration of primary and secondary syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydial infection, and genital herpes in a large county with urban, suburban, and rural settings.

Methods: We geocoded sexually transmitted infections reported to King County, Washington health department in 2000-2001 to census tract of residence. We used a model-based approach to measure concentration with Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients.

Results: Syphilis exhibited the highest level of concentration (estimated Gini coefficient = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64, 0.78), followed by gonorrhea (estimated Gini coefficient=0.57; 95% CI=0.54, 0.60), chlamydial infection (estimated Gini coefficient = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.40, 0.43), and herpes (estimated Gini coefficient=0.26; 95% CI=0.22, 0.29).

Conclusions: Geographically targeted interventions may be most appropriate for syphilis and gonorrhea. For less-concentrated infections, control strategies must reach a wider portion of the population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Lorenz curves for reported cases of 4 sexually transmitted infections in King County, Washington, 2000–2001.
FIGURE 2—
FIGURE 2—
Lorenz curves and confidence bands for (a) primary and secondary syphilis, (b) gonorrhea, (c) chlamydial infection, and (d) initial episodes of genital herpes, King County, Washington, 2000–2001.
FIGURE 3—
FIGURE 3—
Census tracts that account for 50% of estimated cases of (a) primary and secondary syphilis, (b) gonorrhea, (c) chlamydial infection, and (d) initial episodes of genital herpes, after tracts were arranged in descending order by estimated rate, King County, Washington, 2000–2001.…Note. Twenty-one census tracts (of 373 total) in eastern King County are not shown. None of these census tracts accounted for the first 50% of estimated sexually transmitted infection cases when tracts were arranged in descending order by estimated rate.
FIGURE 3—
FIGURE 3—
Census tracts that account for 50% of estimated cases of (a) primary and secondary syphilis, (b) gonorrhea, (c) chlamydial infection, and (d) initial episodes of genital herpes, after tracts were arranged in descending order by estimated rate, King County, Washington, 2000–2001.…Note. Twenty-one census tracts (of 373 total) in eastern King County are not shown. None of these census tracts accounted for the first 50% of estimated sexually transmitted infection cases when tracts were arranged in descending order by estimated rate.
FIGURE 3—
FIGURE 3—
Census tracts that account for 50% of estimated cases of (a) primary and secondary syphilis, (b) gonorrhea, (c) chlamydial infection, and (d) initial episodes of genital herpes, after tracts were arranged in descending order by estimated rate, King County, Washington, 2000–2001.…Note. Twenty-one census tracts (of 373 total) in eastern King County are not shown. None of these census tracts accounted for the first 50% of estimated sexually transmitted infection cases when tracts were arranged in descending order by estimated rate.
FIGURE 3—
FIGURE 3—
Census tracts that account for 50% of estimated cases of (a) primary and secondary syphilis, (b) gonorrhea, (c) chlamydial infection, and (d) initial episodes of genital herpes, after tracts were arranged in descending order by estimated rate, King County, Washington, 2000–2001.…Note. Twenty-one census tracts (of 373 total) in eastern King County are not shown. None of these census tracts accounted for the first 50% of estimated sexually transmitted infection cases when tracts were arranged in descending order by estimated rate.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wasserheit J, Aral S. The dynamic topology of sexually transmitted disease epidemics: implications for prevention strategies. J Infect Dis. 1996;174(suppl 2): S201–S213. - PubMed
    1. Blanchard J. Populations, pathogens, and epidemic phases: closing the gap between theory and practice in the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78(suppl 1):i183–i188. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wasserheit J. STD control strategies: a synthetic overview. Paper presented at: Phase-Specific Strategies for Prevention, Control and Elimination of Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Implications for Research, Policies and Programs; October 3–6, 2000; Rome, Italy. Cosponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the European Commission, the Wellcome Trust, and Health Canada.
    1. Elliot L, Blanchard J, Beaudoin C, et al. Geographical variations in the epidemiology of bacterial sexually transmitted infections in Manitoba, Canada. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78(suppl 1):i139–i144. - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Census Bureau. Available at: http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html. Accessed November 7, 2004.

Publication types