Implementation of surgical audit in Pakistan
- PMID: 1567152
Implementation of surgical audit in Pakistan
Abstract
Surgical audit, while extensively practised in the West, is still widely believed an impossible attainment in developing countries owing to the high cost and technology required to implement it. It is thus a poorly understood and rarely practised exercise in these countries. In this article we attempt to demonstrate the usefulness and feasibility of implementing audit in the setting of a developing country using personal computers (PCs) with simple, inexpensive and easily available software. We discuss the results of data analysis of 18 months of audit conducted by one general surgery team (2 consultants, 4 residents) at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi.
Objective: To implement surgical audit in the setting of a developing country using microcomputers with simple, inexpensive and easily available software.
Design: Data analysis of inpatient audit proformas filled at weekly audit meetings from January 1989-July 1990 using Dbase III Plus.
Setting: One general surgery team (2 consultants, 4 residents) in a tertiary care hospital in Karachi.
Main outcome measures: Disease patterns, caseload, complication rates.
Results: Conditions related to the biliary system made 26.1 per cent of the admitting diagnoses; 25.3 per cent of the patients had some co-existing medical condition as well, diabetes and hypertension being most common. The overall morbidity was 12.3 per cent and the mortality 1.5 per cent. Chest infection, wound infection and urinary retention were the most common post-operative complications.
Conclusions: Results of audit data analysis initiated new research projects and development of protocols to improve patient care. Audit meetings also served as teaching sessions for residents.
Similar articles
-
Risk-adjusted surgical audit with the POSSUM scoring system in a developing country. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity.Br J Surg. 2002 Jan;89(1):110-3. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01979.x. Br J Surg. 2002. PMID: 11851674
-
Guidelines for surgical audit in Australia and New Zealand.ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;76(1-2):78-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03639.x. ANZ J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16483303 Review.
-
Surgical audit in the developing countries.West Afr J Med. 2003 Jan-Mar;22(1):76-8. West Afr J Med. 2003. PMID: 12769314 Review.
-
The Scottish tonsillectomy audit. The Audit Sub-Committee of the Scottish Otolaryngological Society.J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 1996;20:1-25. J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 1996. PMID: 9021536
-
Using audit to monitor and improve the quality of anaesthesia for caesarean section.Health Bull (Edinb). 1999 Sep;57(5):338-43. Health Bull (Edinb). 1999. PMID: 12811881
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Trauma Care capabilities in four countries using the WHO-IATSIC Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care.World J Surg. 2006 Jun;30(6):946-56. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0768-4. World J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16736320
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous