Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Feb;100(2):481-486.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000142125.61206.7A.

The effect of propofol on thermal pain perception

Michael A Frölich  1 , Donald D Price, Michael E Robinson, Jonathan J Shuster, Douglas W Theriaque, Marc W Heft
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The effect of propofol on thermal pain perception

Michael A Frölich et al. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb.

Abstract

We studied the effect of propofol, a widely used sedative-hypnotic drug, on pain perception. Eighteen subjects received propofol in two sedative concentrations that were balanced and randomized in order. Painful (45 degrees C, 47 degrees C, and 49 degrees C) stimulation temperatures were presented in random order, and nonpainful 31 degrees C stimuli were presented on alternate trials. We used a target-controlled infusion and chose effect site concentrations of 0.5 mug/mL for mild sedation and 1.0 mug/mL for moderate sedation. Using a visual analog scale, subjects rated both pain intensity and unpleasantness higher when sedated with propofol. The average pain intensity was 28/100 for placebo, 35/100 for mild, and 40/100 for moderate sedation. Pain unpleasantness was 23/100 for placebo, 29/100 for mild, and 33/100 for moderate sedation. This effect was unexpected and may be explained by a difference of subjective pain experience by a patient and the perceived level of analgesia by a health care provider in sedated patients. This finding calls further attention to the need for adequate analgesia in patients sedated with propofol.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Havel CJ Jr., Strait RT, Hennes H. A clinical trial of propofol vs midazolam for procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6:989–97.
    1. Swanson ER, Seaberg DC, Mathias S. The use of propofol for sedation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:234–8.
    1. Chamorro C, de Latorre FJ, Montero A, et al. Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Crit Care Med 1996;24:932–9.
    1. Carlsson U, Grattidge P. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam. Endoscopy 1995;27:240–3.
    1. Lau WC, Green CR, Faerber GJ, et al. Determination of the effective therapeutic dose of intrathecal sufentanil for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Anesth Analg 1999;89:889–92.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources