Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Feb;100(2):553-558.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130397.38849.4A.

Spinal 2-chloroprocaine for surgery: an initial 10-month experience

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Spinal 2-chloroprocaine for surgery: an initial 10-month experience

Jessica R Yoos et al. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb.

Abstract

Spinal 2-chloroprocaine (2-CP) is currently being investigated as a short-acting alternative to lidocaine, which frequently causes transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) in surgical patients. TNS has not been reported with 2-CP in volunteers in doses ranging from 30 to 60 mg and appears to provide an excellent level of surgical anesthesia. In this retrospective study, we describe the experience with spinal 2-CP in surgical patients during its first 10 mo of clinical use at our institution. Most patients had ambulatory surgery, including 39 orthopedic, 30 general surgical, 18 gynecologic, and 34 genitourinary procedures. Chloroprocaine 30 or 40 mg, with or without fentanyl (10-20 microg), was the most common (92%) dose combination used. Mean peak block height averaged T6 to T8. The surgical procedure time was 32.3 +/- 18.4 min. Time from placement of the block to the end of the surgical procedure was 53.1 +/- 20.7 min. Times to ambulation and discharge were 155.1 +/- 34.7 min and 207.9 +/- 69.4 min, respectively. 2-CP spinal anesthesia has proven to be a safe and effective alternative to lidocaine and procaine for ambulatory surgical procedures of < or =1 h, with a predictable regression of block height. No patients reported TNS after surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pollock JE. Transient neurologic symptoms: etiology, risk factors, and management. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002;27:581–6.
    1. Le Truong JJ, Girard M, Drolet P, et al. Spinal anesthesia: a comparison of procaine and lidocaine. Can J Anaesth 2001;48:470–3.
    1. Hodgson PS, Liu SS, Batra MS, et al. Procaine compared with lidocaine for incidence of transient neurologic symptoms. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000;25:218–22.
    1. Bergeron L, Girard M, Drolet P, et al. Spinal procaine with and without epinephrine and its relation to transient radicular irritation. Can J Anaesth 1999;46:846–9.
    1. Kamphuis ET, Ionescu TI, Kuipers PWG, et al. Recovery of storage and emptying functions of the urinary bladder after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and with bupivacaine in men. Anesthesiology 1998;88:310–6.

LinkOut - more resources