Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD003863.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003863.pub2.

Supportive devices for preventing and treating subluxation of the shoulder after stroke

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Supportive devices for preventing and treating subluxation of the shoulder after stroke

L Ada et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Supportive devices such as slings, wheelchair attachments and orthoses have been used to treat subluxation of the shoulder after stroke.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of supportive devices in preventing subluxation, re-positioning the head of humerus in the glenoid fossa, decreasing pain, increasing function and adversely increasing contracture in the shoulder after stroke.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched on 22 March 2004). In addition, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2004), CINAHL (1982 to March 2004), EMBASE (1974 to March 2004), AMED (1985 to March 2004) and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro, March 2004). We also handsearched conference proceedings and contacted authors for additional information.

Selection criteria: Studies were included if they were: randomised, quasi-randomised or controlled trials; participants had a stroke; intervention was supportive devices; and subluxation, pain, function or contracture were measured.

Data collection and analysis: Two independent reviewers examined the identified studies which were assessed for methodological quality and analysed as (1) supportive devices versus no supportive devices or (2) two supportive devices.

Main results: Four trials (one on slings, three on strapping - 142 participants) met the inclusion criteria. One trial testing a hemisling versus no device reported that no participants had subluxation greater than 10 mm, the same number had lost more than 30 degrees of shoulder external rotation (Peto odds ratio (OR) = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1 to 9.3), and more participants in the hemisling group had pain (Peto OR = 8.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 67.1). The other three showed that strapping was effective in delaying the onset of pain (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 14 days, 95% CI 9.7 to 17.8), but was ineffective in reducing pain severity (WMD = -0.7 cm on a visual analogue scale, 95% CI -2.0 to 0.7), increasing upper limb function (WMD = 0.8, 95% CI -1.5 to 3.1) or affecting the degree of contracture (WMD = -1.4 degrees, 95% CI -10.9 to 8.1) at the shoulder.

Authors' conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to conclude whether slings and wheelchair attachments prevent subluxation, decrease pain, increase function or adversely increase contracture in the shoulder after stroke. There is some evidence that strapping the shoulder delays the onset of pain but does not decrease it, nor does it increase function or adversely increase contracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known

Figures

1
1
Means and 95% CIs for the immediate reduction in subluxation (mm) with the use of supportive devices in an already subluxed shoulder. The vertical dotted line represents the average subluxation before applying supportive devices (calculated across the 4 studies)
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Supportive devices versus no supportive devices, Outcome 1 Pain (number of participants with pain).
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Supportive devices versus no supportive devices, Outcome 2 Pain (number of pain free days after admission to study).
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Supportive devices versus no supportive devices, Outcome 3 Pain (over previous 24 hours on a 10 cm visual analogue scale post intervention).
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Supportive devices versus no supportive devices, Outcome 4 Function (summation of Items 6, 7, 8 of the Motor Assessment Scale (score 0‐18) post intervention).
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Supportive devices versus no supportive devices, Outcome 5 Contracture (number of participants with > 30° loss of shoulder external rotation).
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Supportive devices versus no supportive devices, Outcome 6 Contracture (degrees of shoulder external rotation post intervention).

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003863

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Ancliffe 1992 {published data only}
    1. Ancliffe J. Strapping the shoulder in patients following a cerebrovascular accident (CVA): a pilot study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 1992;38:37‐41. - PubMed
Griffin 2003 {unpublished data only}
    1. Griffin AL, Bernhardt J. Strapping of the hemiplegic shoulder prevents development of shoulder pain during rehabilitation. 1st Neruological Physiotherapy Conference of the National Neurology Group of the Australian Physiotherapy Association. 27‐29 November 2003:Sydney, Australia.
Hanger 2000 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Hanger HC, Whitewood P, Brown G, Ball MC, Harper J, Cox R, Sainsbury R. A randomized controlled trial of strapping to prevent post‐stroke shoulder pain. Clinical Rehabilitation 2000;14:370‐80. - PubMed
Hurd 1974 {published data only}
    1. Hurd MM, Farrell KH, Waylonis GW. Shoulder sling for hemiplegia: friend or foe?. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1974;55:519‐22. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Brooke 1991 {published data only}
    1. Brooke MM, Lateur BJ, Diana‐Rigby GC, Questad KA. Shoulder subluxation in hemiplegia: effects of three different supports. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1991;72:582‐6. - PubMed
Brudny 1985 {published data only}
    1. Brudny J. Functional impact of shoulder taping in the hemiplegic upper extremity. Orthotics and Prosthetics 1985;39:14‐20.
Cool 1989 {published data only}
    1. Cool JC. Biomechanics of orthoses for the subluxed shoulder. Prosthetics & Orthotics International 1989;13:90‐6. - PubMed
Daviet 2002 {published data only}
    1. Daviet JC, Preux PM, Salle JY, Lebreton F, Munoz M, Dudognon P, Pelissier J, Perrigot M. Clinical factors in the prognosis of complex regional pain syndrome type I after stroke: a prospective study. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2002;81:34‐9. - PubMed
Egan 1990 {published data only}
    1. Egan JM. An aid for the management of shoulder pain in hemiplegia. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1990;53:362‐4.
Enstrom 1980 {published data only}
    1. Enstrom J, Davies J. Lapboard modification to help support a flaccid upper extremity. Physical Therapy 1980;6:795‐6. - PubMed
Ferreri 1974 {published data only}
    1. Ferreri J, Tumminelli J. A swivel cockup splint‐type armtrough. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1974;28:359.
Gracies 2000 {published data only}
    1. Gracies JM, Marosszeky JE, Renton R, Sandanam J, Gandevia SC, Burke D. Short‐term effects of dynamic lycra splints on upper limb in hemiplegic patients. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2000;81:1547‐55. - PubMed
Krempen 1977 {published data only}
    1. Krempen JF, Silver RA, Hadley J, Rivera V. The use of the Varney Brace for subluxating shoulders in stroke and upper motor neuron injuries. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 1977;122:204‐6. - PubMed
Moodie 1986 {published data only}
    1. Moodie NB, Brisbin J, Morgan AMG. Subluxation of the glenoidhumeral joint in hemiplegia: evaluation of supportive devices. Physiotherapy Canada 1986;38:151‐7.
Morin 1997 {published data only}
    1. Morin L, Bravo G. Strapping the hemiplegic shoulder: a radiographic evaluation of its efficacy to reduce subluxation. Physiotherapy Canada 1997;49:103‐8.
Patterson 1984 {published data only}
    1. Patterson JR, Zabransky R, Grabois M, Ferro P. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sling orthoses for the correction of glenohumeral subluxation in the hemiplegic. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1984;65:635.
Peters 2003 {published data only}
    1. Peters SB, Lee GP. Functional impact of shoulder taping in the hemiplegic upper extremity. Occupational Therapy in Health Care 2003;17(2):35‐46. - PubMed
Rajaram 1985 {published data only}
    1. Rajaram V, Holtz M. Shoulder forearm support for the subluxed shoulder. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1985;66:191‐2. - PubMed
Roy 1989 {published data only}
    1. Roy CW, Blamire JG. The function shoulder orthosis in hemiplegic shoulder subluxation: a pilot study. Clinical Rehabilitation 1989;3:107‐9.
Sodring 1980 {published data only}
    1. Sodring KM. Upper extremity orthoses for stroke patients. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1980;3:33‐8. - PubMed
Spaulding 1999 {published data only}
    1. Spaulding SJ. Biomechanical analysis of four supports for the subluxed hemiparetic shoulder. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999;66:169‐75. - PubMed
Sullivan 1989 {published data only}
    1. Sullivan BE, Rogers SL. Modified Bobath sling with distal support. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1989;43:47‐9. - PubMed
Walker 1983 {published data only}
    1. Walker J. Modified strapping of roll sling. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1983;37:110‐1. - PubMed
Williams 1988 {published data only}
    1. Williams R, Taffs L, Minuk T. Evaluation of two support methods for the subluxated shoulder of hemiplegic patients. Physical Therapy 1988;68:1209‐14. - PubMed
Zorowitz 1995 {published data only}
    1. Idank DM, Zorowitz RD, Ikai T, Hughes MB, Johnston MV. Shoulder subluxation after stroke: a pilot study comparing four slings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993;74:1235. - PubMed
    1. Zorowitz RD, Idank D, Ikai T, Hughes MB, Johnston MV. Shoulder subluxation after stroke: a comparison of four supports. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1995;76:763‐71. [Idank 1993] - PubMed
Zorowitz 1996 {published data only}
    1. Zorowitz RD, Hughes MB, Idank D, Ikai T, Johnston MV. Shoulder pain and subluxation after stroke: correlation or coincidence?. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1996;50:194‐201. - PubMed
Zorowitz 2001 {published data only}
    1. Zorowitz RD. Recovery patterns of shoulder subluxation after stroke: a six‐month follow‐up study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2001;8:1‐9. - PubMed

Additional references

Ada 2002
    1. Ada L, Foongchomcheay A. Efficacy of electrical stimulation in preventing or reducing subluxation of the shoulder after stroke: A meta‐analysis. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2002;48:257‐67. - PubMed
Ada 2004
    1. Ada L, Goddard E, McCully J, Stavrinos T, Bampton J. 30 minutes of positioning reduces the development of external rotation but not flexion contracture in the shoulder after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (in press). - PubMed
Bohannon 1986
    1. Bohannon R, LeFort A. Hemiplegic shoulder pain measured with the Ritchie Articluar Index. International Journal Rehabilitation Research 1986;9:379‐81.
Bohannon 1990
    1. Bohannon RW, Andrews AW. Shoulder subluxation and pain in stroke patients. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1990;44:507‐9. - PubMed
Cailliet 1980
    1. Cailliet R. The shoulder in hemiplegia. Philadephia: FA Davis Company, 1980:89‐106.
Carr 1985
    1. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical Therapy 1985;65:175‐80. - PubMed
Chaco 1971
    1. Chaco J, Wolf E. Subluxation of the glenohumeral joint in hemiplegia. American Journal of Physical Medicine 1971;50:139‐43. - PubMed
Chino 1981
    1. Chino N. Electrophysiological investigation on shoulder subluxation in hemiplegics. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1981;13:17‐21. - PubMed
Dursun 2000
    1. Durson E, Dursun N, Ural CE, Cakci A. Glenohumeral joint subluxation and reflex sympathetic dystrophy in hemiplegic patients. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitaiton 2000;81:944‐6. - PubMed
Linn 1999
    1. Linn SL, Granat MH, Lee KR. Prevention of shoulder subluxation after stroke with electrical stimulation. Stroke 1999;30(5):963‐8. - PubMed
Miglietta 1959
    1. Miglietta O, Lewitan A, Rogoff JB. Subluxation of the shoulder in hemiplegic patients. New York State Journal of Medicine 1959;1:457‐60. - PubMed
Moseley 2002
    1. Moseley AM, Herbert R, Sherrington C, Maher C. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2002;48:43‐9. - PubMed
Moskowitz 1969
    1. Moskowitz H, Goodman CR, Smith E, Balthazar E, Mellins HZ. Hemiplegic shoulder. New York State Journal of Medicine 1969;15:548‐50. - PubMed
Najenson 1971
    1. Najenson T, Yacubovich E, Pikielni SS. Rotator cuff injury in shoulder joints of hemiplegic patients. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1971;3:131‐7. - PubMed
PEDro
    1. Centre for Evidence‐Based Physiotherapy. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). http://www.pedro.fhs.usyd.edu.au (accessed 21 August 2002).
Shai 1984
    1. Shai G, Ring H, Costeff H, Solzi P. Glenohumeral malalignment in the hemiplegic shoulder: an early radiologic sign. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1984;16:133‐6. - PubMed
Smith 1982
    1. Smith RG, Cruikshank JG, Dunbar S, Akhtar AJ. Malalignment of the shoulder after stroke. British Medical Journal Clinical Research Ed 1982;284:1224‐6. - PMC - PubMed
van Langenberghe 1988
    1. Langenberghe HVK, Hogan BM. Degree of pain and grade of subluxation in the painful hemiplegic shoulder. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1998;20:161‐6. - PubMed
Verhagen 1998
    1. Verhagen AP, Vet HC, Bie RA, Kessels AG, Boers M, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1998;51(12):1235‐41. - PubMed