Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD004312.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004312.pub2.

Botulinum toxin type A versus anticholinergics for cervical dystonia

Affiliations

Botulinum toxin type A versus anticholinergics for cervical dystonia

J Costa et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Cervical dystonia is the most common form of focal dystonia. It is characterized by involuntary posturing of the head and frequently is associated with neck pain. Disability and social withdrawal are common. Most cases are idiopathic and generally cervical dystonia is a life-long disorder. Botulinum toxin Type A (BtA) is now the first line therapy. Before BtA, anticholinergics were the most widely accepted treatment, so it is important to understand how these two treatments compare.

Objectives: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of BtA versus anticholinergic drugs in the treatment of cervical dystonia.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group trials register (June 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE 1977 to June 2003), EMBASE (1977 to June 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

Selection criteria: Randomised studies comparing BtA versus any anticholinergic drug for the treatment of cervical dystonia.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials.

Main results: We found only one trial suitable for inclusion and accordingly no meta-analysis was performed. It compared BtA versus trihexyphenidyl in 66 patients with cervical dystonia. Although this was a relatively small trial with short duration, the results can probably be generalized for the population, since the trial appears to be unbiased and produced clear clinically significant results. The results favoured BtA, and the difference was similar in size to that obtained in a systematic review comparing BtA with placebo. BtA was better tolerated.

Authors' conclusions: The available evidence suggests that BtA injections provide more objective and subjective benefit than trihexyphenidyl to patients with cervical dystonia. We could not draw any conclusions about other anticholinergic drugs. Future trials should explore the role of anticholinergic drugs in patients that do not get benefit with BtA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Costa J, Ferreira JJ, Sampaio C, Moore AP, and Miguel C had been investigators in clinical trials sponsored by Elan, Allergan, and Ipsen. Ferreira JJ, Sampaio C and Moore AP were speakers in symposiums promoted by Elan, Allergan, and Ipsen.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

    1. Brans JW, Lindeboom R, Snoek JW, Zwarts MJ, Weerden TW, Brunt ER, et al. Botulinum toxin versus trihexyphenidyl in cervical dystonia: a prospective, randomized, double‐blind controlled trial. Neurology 1996;46(4):1066‐72. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

    1. Brans JW, Aramideh M, Koelman JHTM, Lindeboom R, Speelman JD, Ongerboer de Visser BW. Electromyography before and after botulinum toxin versus trihexyphenidyl in cervical dystonia. Movement Disorders 1998;13 Suppl 2.
    2. Brans JW, Aramideh M, Koelman JHTM, Lindeboom R, Speelman JD, Ongerboer de Visser BW. Electromyography in cervical dystonia: changes after botulinum and trihexyphenidyl. Neurology 1998;51:815‐9. - PubMed

Additional references

    1. Altman DG, Matthews JN. Statistics notes. Interaction 1: Heterogeneity of effects. BMJ 1996;313(7055):486. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brin. Scientific and Therapeutic Aspects of Botulinum Toxin. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.
    1. Chan J, Brin MF, Fanh S. Idiopathic cervical dystonia: clinical characteristics. Movement Disorders 1991;6:119‐26. - PubMed
    1. Costa J, Ferreira JJ, Sampaio C. Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of cervical dystonia: a systematic review. Movement Disorders 2000;15,Suppl 3:29.
    1. Cullis PA, Walker PC. The treatment of Spasmodic torticollis. In: Quinn NP, Jenner PG, eds. Disorders of movement. San Diego: Academic Press, 1989:295‐301.

Publication types

MeSH terms