Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan 27:3:7.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-7.

Individualized quality of life, standardized quality of life, and distress in patients undergoing a phase I trial of the novel therapeutic Reolysin (reovirus)

Affiliations

Individualized quality of life, standardized quality of life, and distress in patients undergoing a phase I trial of the novel therapeutic Reolysin (reovirus)

Linda E Carlson et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the individualized and standardized quality of life (QL) and psychological distress of patients participating in a Phase I trial of the novel therapeutic reovirus (Reolysin).

Methods: 16 patients with incurable metastatic cancer were interviewed prior to being accepted into the phase I trial with a semi-structured expectations interview, the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life--Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Spiritual Health Inventory (SHI).

Results: Patients were able to complete all measures. They felt hopeful and excited about the trial, with about two thirds hoping for disease regression and one third hoping for a cure. The most commonly spontaneously nominated areas of QL were family relationships, activities and friends, and the overall SEIQoL mean index score was 69. Health was nominated by only 38% of the sample. Scores on the SEIQoL were correlated with global QL on the EORTC QLQ C-30. Scores on the BDI and BSI were lower than reported for similar populations, and on the SHI scores were similar to other samples. Global QL on the EORTC QLQ C-30 and depression scores were associated with time to death in the nine patients who had died at the time of writing.

Conclusions: Individualized QL is easy to assess in seriously ill cancer patients, provides useful information relative to each individual, and is related to standard QL measures. Repeated assessment of individualized QL of patients in Phase I trials would be a useful addition to the research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient #1: Cues, Levels and Weights
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient #2: Cues, Levels and Weights

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Feld R. Endpoints in cancer clinical trials: Is there a need for measuring quality of life? Supportive Care in Cancer. 1995;3:23–27. doi: 10.1007/BF00343917. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morris J, Perez D, McNoe B. The use of quality of life data in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research. 1998;7:85–91. doi: 10.1023/A:1008893007068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiebert GM, Curran D, Aaronson NK. Quality of life as an endpoint in EORTC clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine. 1998;17:561–569. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980315/15)17:5/7<561::AID-SIM803>3.3.CO;2-J. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spilker B. In: Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. Spilker B, editor. New York, Raven Press; 1990.
    1. Taylor K, Macdonald K, Bezjak A, Ng P, Depetrillo AD. Physicians' perspective on quality of life: an exploratory study of oncologists. Quality of Life Research. 1996;5:5–14. doi: 10.1007/BF00435963. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms