Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan 27:5:2.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-2.

Use of email for patient communication in student health care: a cross-sectional study

Johanna Castrén  1 , Marja Niemi, Irma Virjo
Affiliations

Use of email for patient communication in student health care: a cross-sectional study

Johanna Castrén et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: Citizens increasingly use email in personal communication. It is not however clear to what extent physicians utilize it for patient communication. Our study was designed to examine physicians' activity in using email and to estimate the proportion of email messages missing from documentation in electronic patient records (EPR).

Methods: All physicians (n = 76; 48 general practitioners and 28 specialists) at the Finnish Student Health Service received a questionnaire by email, and were asked to print it and keep a daily tally of visits, phone calls and email messages over the study period of one working week (5.5.-9.5.2003). The response rate was 70%. The data originating from the questionnaire were compared with statistical data from the EPR during the study period.

Results: The majority (79%, 41/52) of doctors reported using email with patients, averaging 8.6 (range: 0-96) email contacts and a percentage rate of "email / visit" 20% (range: 0-185%) in one working week. Doctors in the capital city region and those doctors who had a positive attitude toward email for patient communication were most active in email use. Up to 73% of email contacts were not documented in the EPR.

Conclusion: The activity in using email with patients verified among Finnish physicians is compatible with recent study results elsewhere. The notable proportion of un-recorded email messages establishes the need for an electric communication system built into the EPR to improve the quality of patient care and to limit medico-legal risks.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Use of Internet in Finland 2002–2003 http://www.taloustutkimus.fi/index.html?http://www.taloustutkimus.fi/dat...
    1. Moyer CA, Stern DT, Dobias KS, Cox DT, Katz SJ. Bridging the electronic divide: Patient and provider perspectives on e-mail communication in primary care. Am J Manag Care. 2002;8:427–433. - PubMed
    1. Hjortdahl P, Nylenna M, Aasland OG. Internet and the physician-patient relationship – from "thank you" to "why"? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999;119:4339–4341. - PubMed
    1. Gaster B, Knight CL, DeWitt DE, Sheffield JV, Assefi NP, Buchwald D. Physicians' use of and attitudes toward electronic mail for patient communication. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:385–389. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20627.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katz SJ, Moyer CA, Cox DT, Stern DT. Effect of a triage-based E-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care: A randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:736–744. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20756.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms