Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):756.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82. Epub 2005 Jan 26.

Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors

Sara Schroter  1 , Leanne Tite, Richard Smith
Affiliations

Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors

Sara Schroter et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To explore authors' attitudes towards open access publishing and author charges, their perceptions of journals that charge authors, and whether they would be willing to submit to these journals.

Design: Semistructured telephone interviews.

Participants: 28 randomly selected international authors who submitted to the BMJ in 2003.

Results: Authors were more aware of the concepts of open access publishing and author pays models than previously reported. Almost all authors supported the concept of open access, but few had submitted to an open access journal, other than the BMJ. Reasons for not submitting included lack of awareness of which journals publish with open access, and journal quality taking a higher priority in decision making than the availability of open access. Authors disliked the idea of author charges without institutional support and were concerned about implications for authors from developing countries and those without research funding. However, many said they would probably continue to submit to journals they perceived as being of high quality even if they charged authors.

Conclusions: Authors consider perceived journal quality as more important than open access when deciding where to submit papers. New journals with open access may need to do more to reassure authors of the quality of their journals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Adam D. Scientists take on the publishers in an experiment to make research free for all. Guardian 2003. October 6.
    1. Hopkins C. Healthy warning: this journal supports full text, tariff-free archives. Nature webdebates 2001. www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/hopkins.html (accessed 7 July 2004).
    1. Eisen M, Brown P. Should the scientific literature be privately owned and controlled? Nature webdebates 2001. www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/Eisen.htm (accessed 7 July 2004).
    1. Delamothe T, Smith R. Open access publishing takes off: the dream is now achievable. BMJ 2004;328: 1-3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pelizzari E. Academic staff use, perception and expectations about open-access archives. A survey of social science sector at Brescia University. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00000737/01/Academic_staff_perception_a... (accessed 7 July 2004).

Publication types