Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients' choices
- PMID: 15677679
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh708
Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients' choices
Abstract
Background: The aim of the present study was to gain insight into parents' own donor preferences within a system offering the choice between an anonymous and identity-registered donor. A comparison was made between recipients choosing for an anonymous donor (AD choosers) and those choosing for an identifiable donor (ID choosers) with regard to their sexual orientation, demographic characteristics, disclosure issues and infertility distress.
Methods: Data from 105 couples (61% heterosexual, 39% lesbian) were registered on a standardized form during implication counselling sessions previous to treatment.
Results: Sixty-three per cent of the heterosexual couples and 98% of the lesbian couples had chosen an ID donor. Major differences between ID and AD choosers were identified. Among the ID choosers secrecy towards the child was no option, whereas 83% of the AD choosers did not intend to inform their child. Compared with heterosexual ID choosers, AD choosers were more distressed about their infertility and had a lower educational level.
Conclusion: Legislation imposing ID donors appears to be acceptable for the majority of this study population. For a vulnerable group of heterosexual couples, who remained secretive about the use of a donor, adaptation to the new system is not self-evident.
Similar articles
-
Children from anonymous donors: an inquiry into homosexual and heterosexual parents' attitudes.J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;14 Suppl:23-35. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1993. PMID: 8142986
-
Fear, fascination and the sperm donor as 'abjection' in interviews with heterosexual recipients of donor insemination.Sociol Health Illn. 2009 Jul;31(5):705-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01171.x. Epub 2009 May 12. Sociol Health Illn. 2009. PMID: 19470135
-
Contact among families who share the same sperm donor.Fertil Steril. 2008 Jul;90(1):33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.058. Epub 2007 Nov 26. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 18023432
-
The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspring.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;20(3):265-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32830136ca. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18460941 Review.
-
[Sperm or oocyte donation: the dynamics of making the decision regarding the method and timing of disclosure of information to the sibling].Harefuah. 2009 Apr;148(4):251-5, 275. Harefuah. 2009. PMID: 19630349 Review. Hebrew.
Cited by
-
The Child's Right to Know Versus the Parents' Right Not to Tell: The Attitudes of Couples Undergoing Fertility Treatments Towards Identity-Release Gamete Donation.J Reprod Infertil. 2023 Jul-Sep;24(3):198-205. doi: 10.18502/jri.v24i3.13276. J Reprod Infertil. 2023. PMID: 37663427 Free PMC article.
-
The right to know one's genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproduction.Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017 Jan 16;6:3. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0125-0. eCollection 2017. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017. PMID: 28105298 Free PMC article.
-
Disclosure of sperm donation: a comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors.Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Nov;33(5):592-600. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 20. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016. PMID: 27617789 Free PMC article.
-
'Daddy ran out of tadpoles': how parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7-year-olds understand.Hum Reprod. 2010 Oct;25(10):2527-34. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq208. Epub 2010 Aug 18. Hum Reprod. 2010. PMID: 20719810 Free PMC article.
-
Absence or presence? Complexities in the donor narratives of single mothers using sperm donation.Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):117-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev275. Epub 2015 Nov 5. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 26545622 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical