Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Mar;144(5):695-702.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706108.

Relationship between brain serotonin transporter binding, plasma concentration and behavioural effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Affiliations

Relationship between brain serotonin transporter binding, plasma concentration and behavioural effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Kazufumi Hirano et al. Br J Pharmacol. 2005 Mar.

Abstract

1. The present study was undertaken to characterise the relationship between in vivo brain serotonin transporter (SERT) binding, plasma concentration and pharmacological effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in mice. Oral administration of fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline at pharmacologically relevant doses exerted dose- and time-dependent binding activity of brain SERT as revealed by significant increases in KD for specific [3H]paroxetine binding, and the in vivo SERT-binding potency was in the order of paroxetine>>fluoxetine, sertraline>fluvoxamine. 2. The time courses of brain SERT binding by SSRIs in mice were mostly in parallel to those of their plasma concentrations. Also, norfluoxetine (active metabolite) has been suggested to contribute largely to the long-lasting binding activity of brain SERT after the fluoxetine administration. 3. Oral administration of each SSRI suppressed significantly the marble-burying behaviour with no change in locomotor activity in mice, and the extent and time course of suppression agreed well with those of brain SERT binding. Thus, the pharmacological potencies of SSRIs in the attenuation of marble-burying behaviour correlated significantly with their brain SERT binding activities. 4. In conclusion, the present study has provided the first in vivo evidences to support that fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline orally administered bind to the pharmacologically relevant brain SERT in mice and that their SERT-binding characteristics is closely associated with the pharmacokinetics and inhibition of marble-burying behaviour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between oral doses of SSRIs and brain SERT-binding activity (percent increase in KD values for specific [3H]paroxetine binding). Mice received fluvoxamine (6.91–69.1 μmol kg−1), fluoxetine (2.89–28.9 μmol kg−1), paroxetine (0.27–2.67 μmol kg−1) and sertraline (2.92–29.2 μmol kg−1) orally, and the mean values at the times when plasma drug concentration and SERT-binding activity became maximal (0.5 or 1 h for fluvoxamine, 4 h for fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline) were utilised for linear-regression analysis. Each point represents mean±s.e.m. of four to five mice.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time courses of brain SERT-binding activity (percent increase in KD values for specific [3H]paroxetine binding) (a) and plasma concentration (b) at 0.25 to 48 h after oral administration of fluvoxamine (69.1 μmol kg−1), fluoxetine (28.9 μmol kg−1), paroxetine (2.67 μmol kg−1) and sertraline (29.2 μmol kg−1). The plasma concentration of norfluoxetine was also plotted. Each point represents mean±s.e.m. of three to five mice.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of oral administration of fluvoxamine (a, 69.1 μmol kg−1), fluoxetine (b, 28.9 μmol kg−1), paroxetine (c, 2.67 μmol kg−1) and sertraline (d, 29.2 μmol kg−1) on the marble-burying behaviour in mice. At 0.25–48 h after the oral administration of these drugs, mice were placed into the cubic plastic box in which 20 glass marbles were evenly spaced on sawdust, and the number of marbles buried at least two-thirds was counted for 30 min. Each column represents mean±s.e.m. of five to eight (vehicle-treated group) and six to nine (SSRI-treated group) mice. Asterisks show a significant difference from the vehicle control values, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of oral administration of fluvoxamine (69.1 μmol kg−1), fluoxetine (28.9 μmol kg−1), paroxetine (2.67 μmol kg−1) and sertraline (29.2 μmol kg−1) on the locomotor activity in mice. At 1–48 h after the oral administration of SSRIs, the total locomotor activity of mice for 30 min was measured by an activity sensor. Each column represents mean±s.e.m. of eight (vehicle-treated group) and five to eight (SSRI-treated group) mice.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relationship between binding activity of brain SERT (percent increase in KD values for specific [3H]paroxetine binding) and inhibitory effect of marble-burying behaviour (percent decrease in the number of marbles buried by mice) after oral administration of fluvoxamine (69.1 μmol kg−1), fluoxetine (28.9 μmol kg−1), paroxetine (2.67 μmol kg−1) and sertraline (29.2 μmol kg−1). The data for brain SERT-binding activity and suppression of marble-burying behaviour were derived from Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. The mean values at each time point were utilised for correlation analysis, where y, x and r represent inhibitory effect of marble-burying behaviour, brain SERT-binding activity and correlation coefficient, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BOSKER F.J., KLOMPMAKERS A.A., WESTENBERG H.G. Effects of single and repeated oral administration of fluvoxamine on extracellular serotonin in the median raphe nucleus and dorsal hippocampus of the rat. Neuropharmacology. 1995;34:501–508. - PubMed
    1. CACCIA S., CAPPI M., FRACASSO C., GARATTINI S. Influence of dose and route of administration on the kinetics of fluoxetine and its metabolite norfluoxetine in the rat. Psychopharmacology. 1990;100:509–514. - PubMed
    1. DEVANE C.L. Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 1999;19:443–466. - PMC - PubMed
    1. FIGGITT D.P., MCCLELLAN K.J. Fluvoxamine. An updated review of its use in the management of adults with anxiety disorders. Drugs. 2000;60:925–954. - PubMed
    1. FULLER R.W., SNODDY H.D. Drug concentrations in mouse brain at pharmacologically active doses of fluoxetine enantiomers. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1993;45:2355–2358. - PubMed

MeSH terms