Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan 28:6:3.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-3.

Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty

Deborah M Kennedy  1 , Paul W Stratford, Jean Wessel, Jeffrey D Gollish, Dianne Penney
Affiliations

Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty

Deborah M Kennedy et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Physical performance measures play an important role in the measurement of outcome in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty. However, many of the commonly used measures lack information on their psychometric properties in this population. The purposes of this study were to examine the reliability and sensitivity to change of the six minute walk test (6MWT), timed up and go test (TUG), stair measure (ST), and a fast self-paced walk test (SPWT) in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) who subsequently underwent total joint arthroplasty.

Methods: A sample of convenience of 150 eligible patients, part of an ongoing, larger observational study, was selected. This included 69 subjects who had a diagnosis of hip OA and 81 diagnosed with knee OA with an overall mean age of 63.7 +/- 10.7 years. Test-retest reliability, using Shrout and Fleiss Type 2,1 intraclass correlations (ICCs), was assessed preoperatively in a sub-sample of 21 patients at 3 time points during the waiting period prior to surgery. Error associated with the measures' scores and the minimal detectable change at the 90% confidence level was determined. A construct validation process was applied to evaluate the measures' abilities to detect deterioration and improvement at two different time points post-operatively. The standardized response mean (SRM) was used to quantify change for all measures for the two change intervals. Bootstrapping was used to estimate the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the SRMs.

Results: The ICCs (95% CI) were as follows: 6MWT 0.94 (0.88,0.98), TUG 0.75 (0.51, 0.89), ST 0.90 (0.79, 0.96), and the SPWT 0.91 (0.81, 0.97). Standardized response means varied from .79 to 1.98, being greatest for the ST and 6MWT over the studied time intervals.

Conclusions: The test-retest estimates of the 6MWT, ST, and the SPWT met the requisite standards for making decisions at the individual patient level. All measures were responsive to detecting deterioration and improvement in the early postoperative period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Design
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of Times to Complete the Fast Self-Paced Walk Test
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of Preoperative Stair Test Times
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of Preoperative Timed Up and Go Test Times
Figure 5
Figure 5
Distribution of Preoperative 6 Minute Walk Test Distances
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, Hirsch R, Helmick CG, Jordan JM, Kington RS, Lane NE, Nevitt MC, Zhang Y, Sowers M, McAlindon T, Spector TD, Poole AR, Yanovski SZ, Ateshian G, Sharma L, Buckwalter JA, Brandt KD, Fries JF. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2000;133:635–646. - PubMed
    1. Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Anthony JM, Zhang Y, Wilson PW, Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kreger BE, Kannel WB. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. American Journal of Public Health. 1994;84:351–358. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990;28:632–642. - PubMed
    1. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1985;38:27–36. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1987;40:171–178. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types