Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Feb 1;45(3):400-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.068.

The impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy on survival in autosomal-dominant arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVD5)

Affiliations

The impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy on survival in autosomal-dominant arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVD5)

Kathy A Hodgkinson et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to determine the impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with familial arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC).

Background: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is a cause of sudden cardiac death, which may be prevented by ICD.

Methods: We studied 11 families in which a 3p25 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) haplotype at locus ARVD5 segregated with disease and compared mortality in subjects who received an ICD with that in control subjects who were matched for age, gender, ARVC status, and family. Subjects (n = 367) at 50% a priori risk of inheriting ARVC were classified as high risk (HR) (n = 197), low risk (n = 92), or unknown (n = 78) on the basis of clinical events, DNA haplotyping, and/or pedigree position. Forty-eight HR subjects (30 males, [median age 32 years] and 18 females [median age 41 years]) were followed after ICD (secondary to ventricular tachycardia [VT] in 27%). Survival was compared with 58 HR control subjects who were alive at the same age to-the-day at which the ICD subject received the device.

Results: In the HR group, 50% of males were dead by 39 years and females by 71 years: relative risk of death was 5.1 (95% confidence interval 3 to 8.5) for males. The five-year mortality rate after ICD in males was zero compared with 28% in control subjects (p = 0.009). Within five years, the ICD fired for VT in 70% and for VT >240 beats/min in 30%, with no difference in discharge rate when analyzed by ICD indication.

Conclusions: The unknown mutation at the ARVD5 locus causing ARVC results in high mortality. Risk stratification using genetic haplotyping and ICD therapy produced improved survival for males.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Part of one of 11 autosomal-dominant families with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy linked to 3p25 showing family members at high risk (n = 197), low risk (n = 92), and unknown (n = 78) status.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time to death or last follow-up (censored) in high-risk males and females with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy linked to 3p25.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Time to death or last follow-up (censored) in 30 male subjects at high-risk for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy linked to 3p25 who received implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and 36 matched control subjects. (B) Time to death or last follow-up (censored) in 18 female subjects at high risk for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy linked to 3p25 who received ICDs and 22 matched control subjects.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time to first appropriate discharge or last follow-up (censored) for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and for VT >240 beats/min in males who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and time to death or last follow-up (censored) in matched controls with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy linked to 3p25.

Comment in

References

    1. Buxton AE, Lee KL, Fisher JD, et al. A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1882–90. - PubMed
    1. The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1576–84. - PubMed
    1. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1933–40. - PubMed
    1. Connolly SJ, Gent M, Roberts RS, et al. Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS): a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone. Circulation. 2000;101:1297–302. - PubMed
    1. Echt D, Liebson P, Mitchell L, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:781–8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms