Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin
- PMID: 15681009
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.01.003
Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect polymerization contraction stress may have on bond durability.
Methods: Bonding effectiveness was assessed by micro-tensile bond strength testing (muTBS) and electron microscopy. The muTBS to flat dentin surfaces and in standardized cavities was determined (this after 1 day as well as 1 year water storage). Six adhesives representing all current classes were applied: two etch-and-rinse (OptiBond FL, Kerr; Scotchbond 1, 3M ESPE), two self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray; Adper Prompt, 3M ESPE) and two glass-ionomer (Fuji Bond LC, GC; Reactmer, Shofu) adhesives.
Results: The conventional 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive OptiBond FL bonded most effectively to dentin, and appeared insensitive to polymerization shrinkage stress and water degradation. The 2-step self-etch adhesive Clearfil SE Bond most closely approached this superior bonding effectiveness and only slightly lost bond strength after 1-year water exposure. The 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Scotchbond 1 and the 'strong' 1-step self-etch adhesive Adper Prompt appeared very sensitive to cavity configuration and water-aging effects. The 2-step resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive Fuji Bond LC only suffered from shrinkage stress, but not from 1-year water-exposure. Remarkable also is the apparent repairability of the 'mild' 1-step glass-ionomer adhesive Reactmer when stored for 1 year in water, in spite of the very low 1-day muTBS.
Significance: Simplified bonding procedures do not necessarily imply improved bonding performance, especially in the long term.
Similar articles
-
Effect of water storage on the bonding effectiveness of 6 adhesives to Class I cavity dentin.Oper Dent. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(4):456-65. doi: 10.2341/05-57. Oper Dent. 2006. PMID: 16924986 Clinical Trial.
-
One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin.Oper Dent. 2005 Jan-Feb;30(1):39-49. Oper Dent. 2005. PMID: 15765956
-
Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin.Am J Dent. 2003 Dec;16(6):414-20. Am J Dent. 2003. PMID: 15002958
-
New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion.Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):25D-30D. Am J Dent. 2000. PMID: 11763914 Review.
-
Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review.Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e78-93. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 8. Dent Mater. 2010. PMID: 20060160 Review.
Cited by
-
Is a Pre-Existent Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Able to Detect Metal Dental Posts?Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;12(7):229. doi: 10.3390/dj12070229. Dent J (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39057016 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of application mode on interfacial morphology and chemistry between dentine and self-etch adhesives.J Dent. 2013 Mar;41(3):231-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.006. Epub 2012 Nov 12. J Dent. 2013. PMID: 23153573 Free PMC article.
-
Hydroxyapatite effect on photopolymerization of self-etching adhesives with different aggressiveness.J Dent. 2012 Jul;40(7):564-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Mar 22. J Dent. 2012. PMID: 22445789 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of different adhesive system applications on push-out bond strengths of glass fiber posts.J Adv Prosthodont. 2013 Aug;5(3):305-11. doi: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.305. Epub 2013 Aug 31. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013. PMID: 24049572 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of storage time, thermocycling and resin coating on durability of dentin bonding systems.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009 Spring;6(1):29-37. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009. PMID: 21528027 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous