Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Feb;60(2):164-7.
doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.030437.

The need for standardisation of peak flow charts

Affiliations
Review

The need for standardisation of peak flow charts

H K Reddel et al. Thorax. 2005 Feb.

Abstract

Peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring is recommended in asthma guidelines as a tool for assessing severity, monitoring response to treatment, detecting exacerbations, identifying triggers, and providing objective justification for treatment to the patient, but some clinicians have expressed concerns about its relevance in the management of asthma. We have identified a sevenfold variation in the scale of existing PEF charts, with resulting wide variation in the appearance of the same PEF date on different charts. There is an obvious need for standardisation of PEF charts to avoid confusion for patients and to allow development of pattern recognition skills by clinicians. Evidence is provided from visual perception studies to suggest that preference should be given to a horizontally compressed PEF chart to facilitate identification of exacerbations and of overall trends, but this needs to be formally evaluated by retrospective and prospective studies. It is hoped that clinical expertise in PEF pattern recognition can eventually be incorporated into electronic decision making algorithms, as has occurred in occupational asthma, but, in the meantime, the ideal PEF chart for asthma management will represent a compromise between ease of manual data entry and ease of interpretation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Mar;131(1):48-64 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2002 Jan 19;324(7330):146-7 - PubMed
    1. Thorax. 2003 May;58(5):375-6 - PubMed
    1. Arch Dis Child. 2003 Nov;88(11):1021-5 - PubMed
    1. Thorax. 2004 Feb;59(2):94-9 - PubMed

Publication types