Savulescu's objections to the future of value argument
- PMID: 15681684
- PMCID: PMC1734091
- DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.007633
Savulescu's objections to the future of value argument
Abstract
This essay is a response to Julian Savulescu's objections to the future of value argument for the immorality of abortion published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, June 2002. Firstly, Savulescu's claim that the future of value argument has implausible implications is considered. The author argues that the argument does not have these implications. Secondly, properties which, according to Savulescu, could underwrite the wrongness of killing and that are acquired only after implantation, are considered. It is argued that none of these properties is an adequate basis for the distinction between wrongful and permissible killing.
Comment on
-
Abortion, embryo destruction and the future of value argument.J Med Ethics. 2002 Jun;28(3):133-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.3.133. J Med Ethics. 2002. PMID: 12042393 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A future like ours revisited.J Med Ethics. 2002 Jun;28(3):192-5; discussion 202. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.3.192. J Med Ethics. 2002. PMID: 12042408 Free PMC article.
-
The "future like ours" argument and human embryonic stem cell research.J Med Ethics. 2008 Jun;34(6):417-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023556. J Med Ethics. 2008. PMID: 18511611
-
A defence of the potential future of value theory.J Med Ethics. 2002 Jun;28(3):198-201; discussion 202. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.3.198. J Med Ethics. 2002. PMID: 12042410 Free PMC article.
-
Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing.J Med Ethics. 2001 Dec;27(6):363-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.6.363. J Med Ethics. 2001. PMID: 11731597 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995. J Leg Med. 1995. PMID: 8568420 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources