Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands
- PMID: 15681716
- PMCID: PMC1763744
- DOI: 10.1136/sti.2004.010173
Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands
Abstract
Objectives: Chlamydia trachomatis (Chlamydia) is the most prevalent sexually transmitted bacterial infection and can cause considerable reproductive morbidity in women. Chlamydia screening programmes have been considered but policy recommendations are hampered by the lack of population based data. This paper describes the prevalence of Chlamydia in 15-29 year old women and men in rural and urban areas, as determined through systematic population based screening organised by the Municipal Public Health Services (MHS), and discusses the implications of this screening strategy for routine implementation.
Methods: Stratified national probability survey according to "area address density" (AAD). 21 000 randomly selected women and men in four regions, aged 15-29 years received a home sampling kit. Urine samples were returned by mail and tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Treatment was via the general practitioner, STI clinic, or MHS clinic.
Results: 41% (8383) responded by sending in urine and questionnaire. 11% (2227) returned a refusal card. Non-responders included both higher and lower risk categories. Chlamydia prevalence was significantly lower in rural areas (0.6%, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.1) compared with very highly urbanised areas (3.2%, 95% CI 2.4 to 4.0). Overall prevalence was 2.0% (95% CI 1.7 to 2.3): 2.5% (95% CI 2.0 to 3.0%) in women and 1.5% (95% CI 1.1 to 1.8) in men. Of all cases 91% were treated. Infection was associated with degree of urbanisation, ethnicity, number of sex partners, and symptoms.
Conclusion: This large, population based study found very low prevalence in rural populations, suggesting that nationwide systematic screening is not indicated in the Netherlands and that targeted approaches are a better option. Further analysis of risk profiles will contribute to determine how selective screening can be done.
Similar articles
-
A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.Sex Transm Infect. 2005 Feb;81(1):24-30. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.010181. Sex Transm Infect. 2005. PMID: 15681717 Free PMC article.
-
[Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population of Amsterdam. Il Over 90% participation and almost 5% prevalence].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Mar 27;143(13):668-72. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999. PMID: 10321299 Dutch.
-
Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections among the male and female population of the Republic of Macedonia.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005 Jul;19(4):427-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2005.01204.x. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005. PMID: 15987287
-
[Chlamydia trachomatis infections--a time for action?].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007 May 25;132(21):1170-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979394. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007. PMID: 17506013 Review. German.
-
Chlamydia trachomatis: time for screening?Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Sep;11(9):687-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01187.x. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005. PMID: 16104982 Review.
Cited by
-
Chlamydia diagnosis rate in England in 2012: an ecological study of local authorities.Sex Transm Infect. 2017 May;93(3):226-228. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052441. Epub 2016 Aug 31. Sex Transm Infect. 2017. PMID: 27582249 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners.BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Jul 8;12:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-72. BMC Fam Pract. 2011. PMID: 21740536 Free PMC article.
-
Chlamydia trachomatis load in population-based screening and STI-clinics: implications for screening policy.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 31;10(3):e0121433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121433. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25826298 Free PMC article.
-
A randomized trial of home versus clinic-based sexually transmitted disease screening among men.Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Nov;39(11):842-7. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182649165. Sex Transm Dis. 2012. PMID: 23064532 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Population prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the Netherlands. Should asymptomatic persons be tested during population-based Chlamydia screening also for gonorrhoea or only if chlamydial infection is found?BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Mar 7;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-42. BMC Infect Dis. 2006. PMID: 16522201 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical