Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2005 Mar 5;330(7490):511.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38336.482720.8F. Epub 2005 Jan 31.

The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: qualitative study

Frances Griffiths  1 , Eileen Green, Maria Tsouroufli
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: qualitative study

Frances Griffiths et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To describe how clinicians deal with the uncertainty inherent in medical evidence in clinical consultations.

Design: Qualitative study.

Setting: Clinical consultations related to hormone replacement therapy, bone densitometry, and breast screening in seven general practices and three secondary care clinics in the UK NHS.

Participants: Women aged 45-64.

Results: 45 of the 109 relevant consultations included sufficient discussion for analysis. The consultations could be categorised into three groups: focus on certainty for now and this test, with slippage into general reassurance; a coherent account of the medical evidence for risks and benefits, but blurring of the uncertainty inherent in the evidence and giving an impression of certainty; and acknowledging the inherent uncertainty of the medical evidence and negotiating a provisional decision.

Conclusion: Strategies health professionals use to cope with the uncertainty inherent in medical evidence in clinical consultations include the use of provisional decisions that allow for changing priorities and circumstances over time, to avoid slippage into general reassurance from a particular test result, and to avoid the creation of a myth of certainty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Fox RC. Medical uncertainty revisited. In: Bendelow G, Carpenter M, Vautier C, Williams S, eds. Gender, health and healing: the public/private divide. London: Routledge, 2002: 236-53.
    1. Willis J. The paradox of progress. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1995.
    1. Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women. JAMA 2002;288: 321-33. - PubMed
    1. Rosenberger NR. The process of discourse: usages of a Japanese medical term. Soc Sci Med 1992;34: 237-47. - PubMed
    1. McWhinney IR. An acquaintance with particulars... Fam Med 1989;21: 296-8. - PubMed

Publication types