The utility of ancillary techniques in effusion cytology

Abstract

We believe that, in general, immunocytochemical studies when used as a panel are the most helpful of the ancillary techniques in the workup of a difficult effusion cytology case. Routine histochemical stains for mucin should also be employed due to their low cost and simplicity, but suffer from lack of sensitivity and specificity. EM examination is especially helpful in the differentiation of metastatic carcinoma from mesothelioma, but lacks specificity due to overlapping ultrastructural features, and is both costly and labor intensive. Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry is useful in the workup of problematic lymphoid proliferations, but DNA analysis by flow cytometry is not useful as a screening technique. Fortunately, most effusion cytology cases will not need the use of ancillary studies, since the diagnosis will be accurately rendered based on the cytomorphologic findings. However, occasional cases will benefit from the use of specific ancillary studies, which can aid in making an accurate, specific, and rapid diagnosis in an otherwise challenging case.