The interaction between electrosurgical generators, endoscopic electrodes, and tissue
- PMID: 1568605
- DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70374-5
The interaction between electrosurgical generators, endoscopic electrodes, and tissue
Abstract
Endoscopic monopolar and bipolar devices were compared during cutting and coagulation. It was observed on appropriate animal models that the initial resistance (impedance) values recorded correspond to the normal tissue impedance at the electrode. The subsequent impedance values increase 25 to 50 ohms for the coagulator which relates to tissue desiccation and for the cutting electrodes the impedance increases greater than 1000 ohms during the arcing process. At similar power settings, typical monopolar generators produce maximum power at 300 to 500 ohms while typical bipolar generators produce maximum power at 25 to 100 ohms. With impedances greater than 1000 ohms, monopolar generators are capable of higher power output than are bipolar generators. Since cutting is a high impedance process, bipolar cutting electrodes do not perform as intended with typical bipolar generators. Therefore, bipolar cutting electrodes should be employed with a monopolar generator or a generator designed specifically for their use.
Similar articles
-
Bipolar electrosurgical devices.Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1993 Apr;1(2):110-3. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1993. PMID: 8055299
-
Bipolar electrosurgical sphincterotomy.Gastrointest Endosc. 1992 Mar-Apr;38(2):113-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70373-3. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992. PMID: 1568604
-
A new system architecture improves output power regulation in electrosurgical generators.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:6870-3. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091694. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011. PMID: 22255917
-
Electrosurgical generators.Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Aug;78(2):197-208. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.164. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23867369 Review. No abstract available.
-
Electrosurgery: part II. Technology, applications, and safety of electrosurgical devices.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Apr;70(4):607.e1-607.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.055. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014. PMID: 24629362 Review.
Cited by
-
Electrical characteristics of various submucosal injection fluids for endoscopic mucosal resection.Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Jun;53(6):1678-82. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0051-7. Dig Dis Sci. 2008. PMID: 17932749
-
Radio frequency perforation of cardiac tissue: modelling and experimental results.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000 Sep;38(5):575-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02345756. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000. PMID: 11094817
-
Assessment of Electrosurgery Burns in Cardiac Surgery.Trauma Mon. 2015 Nov;20(4):e18996. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.18996. Epub 2015 Nov 23. Trauma Mon. 2015. PMID: 26839854 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources