Resistance of ITI implant connectors to multivectorial fatigue load application
- PMID: 15686095
Resistance of ITI implant connectors to multivectorial fatigue load application
Abstract
Purpose: In an effort to provide patients with mechanically optimized implant connectors, this study was designed to assess the relative fatigue resistance of five types of connectors for the ITI implant system: (1) standard (screw-on) abutments torqued to 35, 70, and 140 Ncm; (2) metal Octa connectors torqued to 35 Ncm; (3) ceramic Octa connectors torqued to 15 and 35 Ncm; (4) cemented cast-on abutments; and (5) an experimental screw-retained composite core.
Materials and methods: To duplicate the alternating and multivectorial intraoral loading patterns, the specimens were subjected to the rotating cantilever beam test. The implants, their connectors, and abutments were spun around their longitudinal axes while a perpendicular force was applied to the external end. The objective was to determine the force level at which 50% of the specimens would survive 106 load cycles. The mean force levels at 50% failure and their 95% confidence intervals were determined using staircase analysis.
Results: The fatigue resistances of the standard (screw-on) abutment, metal Octa connector, and ceramic Octa connector torqued to 35 Ncm were within a few percent of one another. The fatigue resistance of the cemented cast-on abutment was approximately half that of the screwed connectors, and the experimental screw-retained composite core's resistance was about 30%. Increasing the preload in the standard abutments and ceramic Octa connectors increased their fatigue resistance.
Conclusion: Preloaded screwed components were mechanically superior to cemented cast-on abutments and screw-retained composite buildups. For the screw-on connectors, augmenting preload (ie, torque) augmented the resistance to fatigue loading.
Similar articles
-
Resistance of internal-connection implant connectors under rotational fatigue loading.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Mar-Apr;22(2):249-57. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007. PMID: 17465350
-
Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):599-607. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115250. J Prosthet Dent. 2001. PMID: 11404760
-
Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):636-46. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009. PMID: 19885403
-
Effects of fabrication, finishing, and polishing procedures on preload in prostheses using conventional "gold' and plastic cylinders.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Sep-Oct;11(5):589-98. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996. PMID: 8908856 Review.
-
Optimized Planning and Evaluation of Dental Implant Fatigue Testing: A Specific Software Application.Biology (Basel). 2020 Oct 31;9(11):372. doi: 10.3390/biology9110372. Biology (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33142807 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing.J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Aug;19(4):413-20. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011005000018. Epub 2011 Jul 1. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011. PMID: 21710094 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous