Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Feb;27(1):1-13.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.2004.00664.x.

The impact of anaemia on outcome in cancer

Affiliations
Review

The impact of anaemia on outcome in cancer

H Clarke et al. Clin Lab Haematol. 2005 Feb.

Abstract

Anaemia is not an inconsequential side effect of cancer and its treatment should not be ignored. Current practice for anaemia management varies and its role in influencing outcome in cancer patients is under recognized. As a common complication of cancer, anaemia is prevalent in virtually all tumour types to varying degrees. Predictive factors for anaemia include baseline haemoglobin concentration, decrease in haemoglobin concentration within the first month of treatment, tumour type, duration of treatment and prior blood transfusions. Interest in the prognostic significance of anaemia in cancer patients has generated extensive clinical research. Data is now published in a wide range of tumour types confirming that anaemia is a negative prognostic indicator of outcome (e.g. survival, disease-free recurrence and local relapse), with the strongest association in patients receiving radiotherapy. The association has also been documented in patients undergoing chemotherapy and chemoradiation. A retrospective meta-analysis has shown an overall 65% increased risk of death associated with anaemia in cancer patients. The impact of anaemia as an independent prognostic factor for outcome may be mediated by several factors, however the emerging consensus is on the central role of tumour hypoxia. It has been nearly 50 years since R. Thomlinson and L. Gray (British Journal of Cancer 1955, 9: 539) first documented the existence of hypoxia in tumours and it is now well accepted that tumour hypoxia protects tumour cells from therapeutic damage directly by reducing the availability of oxygen-free radicals which are necessary for optimal impact of radiotherapy, certain chemotherapeutic agents and photodynamic therapy. The indirect effects include the impact of hypoxia on gene expression, which affects genetic stability, proliferation kinetics and cellular metabolism. There has been an emergence of preclinical and circumstantial data over recent years that are suggestive of the ability to correct the negative effect of anaemia on outcome by the use of repeated blood transfusions or recombinant human erythropoietin. This has led to some attempts to measure the impact on survival in cancer patients of treating anaemia, but early attempts have served to underline the complexity of the relationship and have produced unexpected results.

PubMed Disclaimer