Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure: classification and regression tree analysis
- PMID: 15687312
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.5.572
Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure: classification and regression tree analysis
Abstract
Context: Estimation of mortality risk in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) may help clinicians guide care.
Objective: To develop a practical user-friendly bedside tool for risk stratification for patients hospitalized with ADHF.
Design, setting, and patients: The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) of patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ADHF in 263 hospitals in the United States was queried with analysis of patient data to develop a risk stratification model. The first 33,046 hospitalizations (derivation cohort; October 2001-February 2003) were analyzed to develop the model and then the validity of the model was prospectively tested using data from 32,229 subsequent hospitalizations (validation cohort; March-July 2003). Patients had a mean age of 72.5 years and 52% were female.
Main outcome measure: Variables predicting mortality in ADHF.
Results: When the derivation and validation cohorts are combined, 37,772 (58%) of 65,275 patient-records had coronary artery disease. Of a combined cohort consisting of 52,164 patient-records, 23,910 (46%) had preserved left ventricular systolic function. In-hospital mortality was similar in the derivation (4.2%) and validation (4.0%) cohorts. Recursive partitioning of the derivation cohort for 39 variables indicated that the best single predictor for mortality was high admission levels of blood urea nitrogen (> or =43 mg/dL [15.35 mmol/L]) followed by low admission systolic blood pressure (<115 mm Hg) and then by high levels of serum creatinine (> or =2.75 mg/dL [243.1 micromol/L]). A simple risk tree identified patient groups with mortality ranging from 2.1% to 21.9%. The odds ratio for mortality between patients identified as high and low risk was 12.9 (95% confidence interval, 10.4-15.9) and similar results were seen when this risk stratification was applied prospectively to the validation cohort.
Conclusions: These results suggest that ADHF patients at low, intermediate, and high risk for in-hospital mortality can be easily identified using vital sign and laboratory data obtained on hospital admission. The ADHERE risk tree provides clinicians with a validated, practical bedside tool for mortality risk stratification.
Comment in
-
Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure.JAMA. 2005 May 25;293(20):2467-8; author reply 2468. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.20.2467-c. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15914743 No abstract available.
-
A risk stratification tool predicted in-hospital mortality in acute decompensated heart failure.ACP J Club. 2005 Jul-Aug;143(1):25. ACP J Club. 2005. PMID: 15989313 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Risk of in-hospital mortality identified according to the typology of patients with acute heart failure: classification tree analysis on data from the Acute Heart Failure Database-Main registry.J Crit Care. 2013 Jun;28(3):250-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Nov 14. J Crit Care. 2013. PMID: 23159137
-
Timing of immunoreactive B-type natriuretic peptide levels and treatment delay in acute decompensated heart failure: an ADHERE (Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry) analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Aug 12;52(7):534-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.010. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 18687247
-
A validated risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure from the American Heart Association get with the guidelines program.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jan;3(1):25-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.854877. Epub 2009 Dec 8. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010. PMID: 20123668
-
The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE): opportunities to improve care of patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2003;4 Suppl 7:S21-30. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2003. PMID: 14668697 Review.
-
Clinical predictors of in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure-piecing together the outcome puzzle.Congest Heart Fail. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):127-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2008.04641.x. Congest Heart Fail. 2008. PMID: 18550923 Review.
Cited by
-
The multifaceted roles of neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) in inflammation and cancer.Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Aug;1826(1):129-69. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Mar 31. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012. PMID: 22513004 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of Volume Overload With Kidney Function Outcomes Among Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Jul 23;5(10):1661-1669. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.07.015. eCollection 2020 Oct. Kidney Int Rep. 2020. PMID: 33102958 Free PMC article.
-
The use of the CALL Risk Score for predicting mortality in Brazilian heart failure patients.ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):2331-2339. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12770. Epub 2020 Jul 1. ESC Heart Fail. 2020. PMID: 32608119 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrafiltration in decompensated heart failure.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2005 Sep;2(3):148-54. doi: 10.1007/s11897-005-0023-1. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2005. PMID: 16138951 Review.
-
Different prognostic association of systolic blood pressure at different time points with postdischarge events in patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure.J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019 Sep;16(9):676-688. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.09.009. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31645853 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical