Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty

Abstract

Currently, minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty is defined as an incision length of < 14 cm. However, the length of the incision is not the primary influence on potential postoperative benefits to the patient and should not be the only characteristic of the minimally invasive approach for knee arthroplasty. Some other factors that should also be included in this definition are: 1. The amount of soft-tissue dissection (including muscle, ligament, and capsular damage). 2. Patellar retraction or eversion. 3. Tibiofemoral dislocation. Minimally invasive surgery should not be considered to be a cosmetic procedure but rather one that addresses patients' concerns with regard to postoperative pain and slow rehabilitation. Standard total knee arthroplasties provide pain relief, but returning to activities of daily living remains a challenge for some individuals, who may take several weeks to recover. Several studies have demonstrated long-term success (at more than ten years) of standard total knee arthroplasties. However, many patients remain unsatisfied with the results of the surgery. In a study of functional limitations of patients with a Knee Society score of > or = 90 points after total knee arthroplasty, only 35% of patients stated that they had no limitations. This finding was highlighted in a study by Dickstein et al., in which one-third of the elderly patients who underwent knee replacement were unhappy with the outcome at six and twelve months postoperatively. Although many surgeons utilize objective functional scoring systems to evaluate outcome, it is likely that the criteria for a successful result of total knee arthroplasty differ between the patient and the surgeon. This was evident in a report by Bullens et al., who concluded that surgeons are more satisfied with the results of total knee arthroplasty than are their patients. Trousdale et al. showed that, in addition to concerns about long-term functional outcome, patients' major concerns were postoperative pain and the time required for recovery. Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty have specific functional goals, such as climbing stairs, squatting, kneeling, and returning to some level of low-impact sports after surgery. Our clinical investigations demonstrated that the minimally invasive surgical approach reduces hospital stays, decreases postoperative pain, and decreases rehabilitation needs as well as enables patients to return to normal function more quickly. It is important for surgeons to take an evolutionary, rather than a revolutionary, approach when performing minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. The surgeon should downsize incisions progressively to prevent severe damage to the quadriceps mechanism. Extensive open exposure, prolonged patellar eversion, and dislocation of the tibiofemoral joint should evolve into a vastus medialis muscle split with patellar subluxation, retraction but not dislocation of the patella, and avoidance of gross dislocation of the tibiofemoral joint. Developing the techniques of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty may be difficult and time-consuming, but patient benefits and satisfaction should outweigh the extra effort required. These changes require well-designed clinical studies to further document their effectiveness.