Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Feb;112(2):200-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.08.019.

Scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements after LASIK

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements after LASIK

Linda M Zangwill et al. Ophthalmology. 2005 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements before and after LASIK.

Design: Cohort study.

Participants: Twenty participants undergoing LASIK and 14 normal controls.

Methods: Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness was measured before LASIK and approximately 3 months after surgery in one eye each of 20 patients using a scanning laser polarimeter (GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer) with fixed corneal compensation (FCC), one with variable corneal compensation (GDx VCC), and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Fourteen normal controls also were tested at baseline and approximately 3 months later.

Main outcome measures: Retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses measured with the GDx FCC, GDx VCC, and OCT.

Results: At baseline, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) RNFL thicknesses for the GDx FCC, GDx VCC, and OCT were 78.1 microm (72.2-83.9), 54.3 microm (52.7-56.0), and 96.8 microm (93.2-100.5), respectively. In both LASIK and control groups, there were no significant changes between baseline and follow-up examinations in GDx VCC and OCT RNFL thickness measurements globally or in the superior and inferior quadrants (mean change, <5 microm for each instrument). In the control group, there also was no significant change in GDx FCC measurements between baseline and follow-up. In LASIK patients, significant reductions were observed in GDx FCC RNFL measurements. Average absolute values of the mean (95% CI) change in thickness were 12.4 microm (7.7-17.2), 15.3 microm (9.6-20.9), and 12.9 microm (7.6-18.1) for GDx FCC RNFL measurements superiorly, inferiorly, and globally, respectively (all Ps < or = 0.001).

Conclusions: LASIK does not seem to change RNFL thickness. Reduction in GDx FCC RNFL thickness measurements after LASIK is a measurement artifact and is most likely due to erroneous compensation for corneal birefringence. With scanning laser polarimetry, it is mandatory to compensate individually for change in corneal birefringence after LASIK to ensure accurate RNFL assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources