Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 May;74(5):1110-5.
doi: 10.1210/jcem.74.5.1569157.

Insulin-antagonistic effects of pulsatile and continuous glucagon infusions in man--a comparison with the effect of adrenaline

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Insulin-antagonistic effects of pulsatile and continuous glucagon infusions in man--a comparison with the effect of adrenaline

S Attvall et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992 May.

Abstract

The insulin-antagonistic effects of pulsatile (3 min pulses every 20 min) and continuous glucagon infusions were studied over 4 h with the euglycemic clamp technique in healthy subjects. Comparisons were made to the effect of a continuous adrenaline infusion. Glucose production and utilization were evaluated with D-3-3H-glucose and somatostatin was used in all studies to inhibit the endogenous release of insulin and glucagon. The amount of glucagon given during the pulsatile infusions (27% of that during continuous infusion) was adjusted so that the peak glucagon levels were the same as during the continuous infusion (372 +/- 22 and 365 +/- 20 ng/L, respectively). The insulin-antagonistic effects of pulsatile and continuous glucagon infusions were similar during the first hour and imparied the insulin effect with 44 +/- 8 and 47 +/- 6%, respectively. However, when infused continuously, the effect of glucagon declined rapidly, whereas the effect of a pulsatile infusion decreased more slowly and was evident for 3 h. Raising the glucagon level 4-fold restored the insulin-antagonistic effect again suggesting that the cells had become desensitized. In contrast, the insulin-antagonistic effect of adrenaline was persistent throughout the 4 h of the study and impaired insulin action with 54 +/- 2%. The effects of pulsatile and continuous glucagon infusions were entirely due to the stimulation of glucose production while that of adrenaline mainly was due to inhibition of peripheral glucose uptake. In conclusion, the acute stimulatory effect of glucagon on glucose production is transient but it is better maintained when given as intermittent pulses rather than as a continuous infusion. In contrast, the insulin-antagonistic effect of adrenaline on glucose uptake is persistent for at least 4 h.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources