Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Winter;17(1):69-73.
doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1701_12.

Structured problem-related anatomy demonstrations: making order of random teaching events

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Structured problem-related anatomy demonstrations: making order of random teaching events

Marwan F Abu-Hijleh et al. Teach Learn Med. 2005 Winter.

Abstract

Background: A standardized learning activity called "Structured Problem-Related Anatomy Demonstrations" was recently implemented. This activity is intended to be a substitute to the need-based instruction method in which students schedule appointments in small groups or individually with faculty to discuss issues and difficulties related to anatomy the students have encountered during their tutorial discussions and self-study learning.

Description: Students in a given year were divided into 2 groups. Each group was further divided into 4 small groups (n = 10) who rotated through 4 "stations." A faculty member who demonstrated a specific aspect of anatomy related to the weekly health problem staffed each of the stations.

Evaluation: The effect of the new method of instruction on students' performance in end-of-unit examinations was not statistically significant. A 5-point scale questionnaire seeking the perceptions of 3rd- and 4th-year medical students (n = 176), who had experience with both methods, was used. The means +/- standard deviation of students' responses to items related to organization was 3.61 +/- 0.55, to knowledge was 4.29 +/- 0.73, to integration was 3.91 +/- 0.73, and to skills was 3.84 +/- 0.83. The vast majority of students expressed their overall support for continuing the new system (4.54 +/- 0.58).

Conclusions: The new method increased students' satisfaction and confidence while maintaining their level of performance in final assessments. Faculty have more control over their schedules and can devote more quality time to teaching and research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources