Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors' personal and professional lives: the importance of being open to criticism from colleagues
- PMID: 15691998
- PMCID: PMC1743972
- DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2002.003657
Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors' personal and professional lives: the importance of being open to criticism from colleagues
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of adverse events that had caused patient injury and for which the doctor felt responsible, and the experience of acceptance of criticism among colleagues.
Design: Self-reports based on postal questionnaires to 1616 doctors.
Setting: Norway.
Participants: A representative sample of 1318 active doctors.
Results: 368/1294 (28%) reported that they had experienced at least one adverse event with serious patient injury. Being male and working within a surgical discipline (including anaesthesiology, obstetrics and gynaecology) significantly increased the probability of such reports. 38% of the events had been reported to official authorities and, for 17% of doctors, the incident had a negative impact on their private life; 6% had needed professional help. 50% and 54%, respectively, found it difficult to criticise colleagues for their ethically or professionally unacceptable conduct. Doctors who found it easy to criticise colleagues also reported having received more support from their colleagues after a serious patient injury.
Conclusion: Male surgeons report the highest prevalence of adverse events. Criticism for professionally and ethically unacceptable conduct is difficult to express among doctors. More acceptance of criticism of professional conduct may not only prevent patient harm, but may also give more support to colleagues who have experienced serious patient injury.
Similar articles
-
[Attitudes to medical errors and patient injury among doctors and medical students].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Aug 24;126(16):2129-32. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006. PMID: 16932785 Norwegian.
-
[To what extent are Norwegian doctors familiar with their own support systems?].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Dec 14;126(24):3256-7. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006. PMID: 17170771 Norwegian.
-
Moral distress among Norwegian doctors.J Med Ethics. 2008 Jul;34(7):521-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021246. J Med Ethics. 2008. PMID: 18591286
-
Providing protection for doctors.Med J Malaysia. 2003 Mar;58 Suppl A:141-5. Med J Malaysia. 2003. PMID: 14556362 Review.
-
Disclosing errors and adverse events in the intensive care unit.Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1532-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215109.91452.A3. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16540948 Review.
Cited by
-
Dealing with complaints.BMJ. 2008 Feb 9;336(7639):326-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39455.639340.AD. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18258968 Free PMC article.
-
Navigating the Second Victim Experience in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Colonoscopy.JGH Open. 2025 Jul 1;9(7):e70215. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70215. eCollection 2025 Jul. JGH Open. 2025. PMID: 40599809 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Second victims in health care: current perspectives.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Aug 12;10:593-603. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S185912. eCollection 2019. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019. PMID: 31496861 Free PMC article.
-
Nurses' families' experiences of involvement in nursing errors: A qualitative study.Int J Nurs Sci. 2019 Jan 14;6(2):154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.01.004. eCollection 2019 Apr 10. Int J Nurs Sci. 2019. PMID: 31406885 Free PMC article.
-
The implementation of unit-based perinatal mortality audit in perinatal cooperation units in the northern region of the Netherlands.BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 9;12:195. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-195. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 22776712 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources