The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients
- PMID: 15692349
- DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000149588.09148.53
The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients
Abstract
The authors retrospectively reviewed the computerized records of 71 women undergoing 80 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions after mastectomy over a 1-year period. There were 33 normal, 26 overweight, and 12 obese patients. No statistically significant difference in flap complications was found between groups. Overall fat necrosis rates were 11.4 percent for the normal-weight patients, 6.7 percent for the overweight patients, and 6.7 percent for the obese patients. Postoperative hospital time was similar for all groups. The occurrence of abdominal wall fascial laxity was uncommon and similar for all groups. Large (>900 g) reconstructions were completed without prohibitive complications in the reconstruction flap. The DIEP flap represents a significant advance in autologous breast tissue reconstruction. Although concerns regarding fat necrosis rates in DIEP flaps have been voiced, the authors did not see an increasing rate of fat necrosis in their overweight and obese patients, and their overall rate of fat necrosis is comparable to rates reported for free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. Also, increasing body mass index did not seem to affect the rate of delayed complications of the abdominal wall, such as abdominal wall hernia or bulging. Although it was not statistically significant, the authors did observe a trend toward increased wound-healing complications with increasing body mass index. Their data also support the claim that the complete sparing of the rectus abdominis muscles afforded by the DIEP flap avoids abdominal wall fascial bulging or defects often seen in obese TRAM reconstruction patients. Because flap and wound complication rates are similar or superior to those of other autologous tissue reconstruction techniques and the occurrence of abdominal wall defects is all but eliminated, the DIEP flap likely represents the preferred autologous breast reconstruction technique for overweight and obese patients.
Similar articles
-
DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 May;117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000210679.77449.7d. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006. PMID: 16651940
-
Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Apr;105(5):1640-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200004050-00007. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000. PMID: 10809092
-
Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000400. Ann Plast Surg. 2016. PMID: 25536199
-
Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):367-374. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de1b7e. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010. PMID: 20679822
-
Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap?Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;80(6S Suppl 6):S418-S420. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001319. Ann Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 29369109 Review.
Cited by
-
Violation of the rectus complex is not a contraindication to component separation for abdominal wall reconstruction.J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Feb;214(2):131-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.015. Epub 2011 Dec 9. J Am Coll Surg. 2012. PMID: 22169002 Free PMC article.
-
Goldilocks mastectomy with immediate reconstruction: enhancing aesthetic outcomes and preserving nipple complex.J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Nov 4;2024(11):rjae682. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae682. eCollection 2024 Nov. J Surg Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 39498463 Free PMC article.
-
The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov;130(5):991-1000. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318267efc5. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012. PMID: 23096600 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Morphometric Measurements on Preoperative CT Angiograms to Determine Risk of Abdominal Donor Site Complications-A Retrospective Review of 174 Patients.Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Aug;32(3):434-444. doi: 10.1177/22925503221128987. Epub 2022 Oct 17. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024. PMID: 39104940 Free PMC article.
-
Breast reconstruction after mastectomy in patients with obesity: a narrative review.Ann Transl Med. 2023 Dec 20;11(12):413. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1599. Epub 2023 Sep 20. Ann Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 38213816 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical