Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Jan;20(1):1-6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40052.x.

Alcohol screening in young persons attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Comparison of AUDIT, CRAFFT, and CAGE instruments

Robert L Cook  1 , Tammy Chung, Thomas M Kelly, Duncan B Clark
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Alcohol screening in young persons attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Comparison of AUDIT, CRAFFT, and CAGE instruments

Robert L Cook et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the ability of 3 brief alcohol screens (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [AUDIT], CRAFFT, and CAGE) to identify adolescents and young adults with a current alcohol use disorder (AUD) and to determine whether there are gender-based or race-based differences in screening performance.

Design, participants, and setting: Cross-sectional study of 358 young persons (55% males; 49% blacks; age range, 15-24 years; mean age, 20.6 years) who were attending an urban clinic for sexually transmitted diseases and reported alcohol use during the past year.

Measurements: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the ability of the 3 screens to discriminate between participants with and without AUDs detected in the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID).

Results: One third (33%) of participants met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) criteria for a current AUD (24% with alcohol abuse and 9% with alcohol dependence). The AUDIT performed best at a cut score of 9 (sensitivity, 0.76; specificity, 0.79), CRAFFT at a cut score of 2 (sensitivity, 0.94; specificity, 0.33), and CAGE at a cut score of 1 (sensitivity, 0.69; specificity, 0.63). The AUDIT had the best overall performance (area under the curve [AUC], 0.84), followed closely by CRAFFT (AUC, 0.79) and then CAGE (AUC, 0.70). Performance of screens did not differ by gender. The AUDIT performed slightly better in whites than blacks, but no race-based differences were observed for the CAGE or CRAFFT.

Conclusions: Clinicians should use the AUDIT or CRAFFT, rather than the CAGE, to screen young persons for AUDs. The AUDIT performs best, but its length may limit its utility in this setting. The CRAFFT is a suitable alternative, with excellent sensitivity and no gender-based or race-based differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Receiver operating characteristic curves for AUDIT, CRAFFT, and CAGE screens (n =358).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Bonnie RJ, O'Connell ME, editors. Committee on Developing a Strategy to Reduce and Prevent Underage Drinking. Reducing Underage Drinking: A Collective Responsibility. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
    1. O'Connor PG, Schottenfeld RS. Patients with alcohol problems. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:592–602. - PubMed
    1. Kelly TM, Donovan JE, Cornelius JR, Bukstein OG, Delbridge TR, Clark DB. Psychiatric disorders among older adolescents treated in emergency departments on weekends: a comparison with a matched community sample. J Stud Alcohol. 2003;64:616–22. - PubMed
    1. Deitz D, Rohde M, Bertolucci M, Dufour M. Prevalence of screening for alcohol use by physicians during routine physical examination. Alcohol Health Res World. 1994;18:162–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types