Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2005 Jan;20(1):52-7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40009.x.

Patient-physician web messaging. The impact on message volume and satisfaction

Eric M Liederman  1 , Jerry C Lee, Victor H Baquero, Paul G Seites
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Patient-physician web messaging. The impact on message volume and satisfaction

Eric M Liederman et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Patients want electronic access to providers. Providers fear being overwhelmed by unreimbursed messages.

Objective: Measure the effects of patient-physician web messaging on primary care practices.

Design/setting: Retrospective analysis of 6 case and 9 control internal medicine (IM) and family practice (FP) physicians' message volume, and a survey of 5,971 patients' web messaging with 267 providers and staff in 16 community primary care clinics in the Sacramento, CA region.

Measurements and main results: Case telephone volume was 18.2% lower (P=.002) and fell 6.50 times faster than control. Case total telephone plus web message volume was 13.7% lower (P=.025) and fell 5.84 times faster than control. Surveys were responded to by 40.3% (1,743/4,320) of patients and 61.4% (164/267) of providers and staff. Patients were overwhelmingly satisfied and providers and staff were generally satisfied; both found the system easy to use. Patient satisfaction correlated strongly with provider response time (Gamma=0.557), and provider/staff satisfaction with computer skills (Gamma=0.626) (Goodman-Kruskal Gamma [Gamma] measure of ordinal association).

Conclusions: Secure web messaging improves on e-mail with encryption, access controls, message templates, customized message and prescription routing, knowledge content, and reimbursement. Further study is needed to determine whether reducing telephone traffic through the use of web messaging decreases provider interruptions and increases clinical efficiency during the workday. Satisfaction with web messaging may increase patient retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient enrollment and monthly message volume.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Incoming telephone calls and patient web messages per 1,000 panel points per workday. Phone means: case 21.61, control 26.43 (P =.002). Regression slopes: case −0.66, control −0.10. Phone+web means: case 22.80, control 26.43 (P =.025). Regression slopes: case −0.60, control −0.10.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Patient satisfaction survey of the web messaging system. Black line represents standard deviation.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Provider and staff survey results of the web messaging system. Black line represents standard deviation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bertakis KD. The communication of information from physician to patient: a method for increasing patient retention and satisfaction. J Fam Pract. 1977;5:217–22. - PubMed
    1. Roter DL, Hall JA, Kern DE, Barker LR, Cole KA, Roca RP. Improving physicians' interviewing skills and reducing patients' emotional distress. A randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1877–84. - PubMed
    1. Greene MG, Adelman RD, Friedmann E, Charon R. Older patient satisfaction with communication during an initial medical encounter. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1279–88. - PubMed
    1. Waitzkin H. Doctor-patient communication. Clinical implications of social scientific research. JAMA. 1984;252:2441–6. - PubMed
    1. Korsch BM. What do patients and parents want to know? What do they need to know? Pediatrics. 1984;74(pt 2):917–9. - PubMed

Publication types