Cisplatin-cyclophosphamide versus carboplatin-cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized phase III study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group
- PMID: 1569444
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.5.718
Cisplatin-cyclophosphamide versus carboplatin-cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized phase III study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group
Abstract
Purpose: Given the potential for improved tolerance, a trial was initiated to compare the toxicity and efficacy of a standard regimen of cisplatin-cyclophosphamide (75 mg/m2 and 600 mg/m2, respectively) with an experimental regimen of carboplatin-cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2 and 600 mg/m2, respectively) in women with postoperative macroscopic residual ovarian cancer.
Patients and methods: Between 1985 and 1989, 447 (417 eligible) patients were randomized. Treatment arms were well balanced; most patients had stage III (82%), grade 3 (54%) tumors with bulky residual (greater than 2 cm in 59%), and good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0 or 1, 77%). Response was assessed after six 4-week cycles.
Results: The treatments were equally deliverable, with 76% of patients completing their allocated regimen. The reported reasons for failure to complete treatment differed; toxicity/refusal predominated on the cisplatin arm, and progressive disease predominated on the carboplatin arm (P = .0092). Cisplatin-treated patients were more likely to develop neuropathy and nephropathy, and carboplatin patients experienced myelosuppression, particularly thrombocytopenia. Efficacy was similar, with no significant differences for the cisplatin and carboplatin arms in clinical response rate (57% v 59% in those with measurable disease), pathologic response rate (52% v 54% in those suitable for relaparotomy), time to progression (median, 56 v 58 weeks), or overall survival (median, 100 weeks v 110 weeks). Time to progression and survival were predicted by residual disease size, performance status, and treatment center (with those treated at centers that accrued more patients doing better).
Conclusion: Neither regimen is optimal in that relapse remains the norm. It may be inappropriate to expect that any single regimen can be an effective therapy for all patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Both cisplatin and carboplatin are likely to have a role in future treatment strategies.
Comment in
-
Search for the optimal treatment of ovarian cancer: heavy metals, "belly baths," and ... yew trees.J Clin Oncol. 1992 May;10(5):683-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.5.683. J Clin Oncol. 1992. PMID: 1569441 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Improved therapeutic index of carboplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide: final report by the Southwest Oncology Group of a phase III randomized trial in stages III and IV ovarian cancer.J Clin Oncol. 1992 May;10(5):706-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.5.706. J Clin Oncol. 1992. PMID: 1569443 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized study comparing carboplatin/cyclophosphamide and cisplatin/cyclophosphamide as first-line treatment in patients with stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer and small volume disease. German Ovarian Cancer Study Group (GOCA).Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Jul;66(1):75-84. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4690. Gynecol Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9234925 Clinical Trial.
-
ICON 2 and ICON 3 data in previously untreated ovarian cancer: results to date.Semin Oncol. 1997 Oct;24(5 Suppl 15):S15-23-S15-25. Semin Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9346217 Clinical Trial.
-
Carboplatin versus cisplatin in ovarian cancer.Semin Oncol. 1995 Oct;22(5 Suppl 12):88-90. Semin Oncol. 1995. PMID: 7481869 Review.
-
Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian carcinoma: current standards of care based on randomized trials.Gynecol Oncol. 1994 Dec;55(3 Pt 2):S97-107. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1347. Gynecol Oncol. 1994. PMID: 7835816 Review.
Cited by
-
A phase II randomised clinical trial comparing cisplatin, paclitaxel and ifosfamide with cisplatin, paclitaxel and epirubicin in newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: long-term survival analysis.Br J Cancer. 2008 Feb 26;98(4):720-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604231. Epub 2008 Feb 5. Br J Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18253120 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: four systematic meta-analyses of individual patient data from 37 randomized trials. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists' Group.Br J Cancer. 1998 Dec;78(11):1479-87. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.710. Br J Cancer. 1998. PMID: 9836481 Free PMC article.
-
Ototoxicity after high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin followed by stem cell transplantation in patients with breast cancer.Med Oncol. 2000 Nov;17(4):287-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02782193. Med Oncol. 2000. PMID: 11114707
-
Carboplatin and cisplatin: are they equivalent in efficacy in "optimal residual" advanced ovarian cancer?J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1996;122(8):443-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01187154. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8698742 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
New platinum agents. A comparison in ovarian cancer.Drugs Aging. 1994 Aug;5(2):85-95. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199405020-00002. Drugs Aging. 1994. PMID: 7981487 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical