In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration Lessons learned and implications for active living research
- PMID: 15694529
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.016
In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration Lessons learned and implications for active living research
Abstract
The past 2 decades have witnessed a surge of interest and investment in transdisciplinary research teams and centers. Only recently, however, have efforts been made to evaluate the collaborative processes and scientific and public policy outcomes of these endeavors. This paper offers a conceptual framework for understanding and evaluating transdisciplinary research, and describes a large-scale national initiative, the National Institutes of Health Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers (TTURCs) program, undertaken to promote cross-disciplinary scientific collaboration in the field of tobacco use science and prevention. A 5-year evaluation of collaborative processes and outcomes observed across multiple TTURC centers conducted during 1999 to 2004 is described. The findings highlight key contextual circumstances faced by participating centers (i.e., the breadth of disciplines and departments represented by each center, the extent to which members had worked together on prior projects, spatial proximity among researchers' offices, and frequency of their face-to-face interaction) that influenced their readiness for collaboration and prompted them to follow different pathways toward transdisciplinary integration. Implications of these findings for developing and evaluating future transdisciplinary research initiatives in the field of active living research are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Bridging basic and clinical science with policy studies: The Partners with Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers experience.Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 May;11(5):467-74. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp040. Epub 2009 Apr 3. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009. PMID: 19346504
-
The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration.Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003. Am J Prev Med. 2008. PMID: 18619410 Review.
-
Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science.Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.020. Am J Prev Med. 2008. PMID: 18619395
-
Evaluating transdisciplinary science.Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Dec;5 Suppl 1:S21-39. doi: 10.1080/14622200310001625555. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003. PMID: 14668085 Review.
-
Transdisciplinarity among tobacco harm-reduction researchers: a network analytic approach.Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S173-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.015. Am J Prev Med. 2008. PMID: 18619397
Cited by
-
Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity.Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.007. Am J Prev Med. 2008. PMID: 18619406 Free PMC article.
-
A transdisciplinary training program for behavioral oncology and cancer control scientists.Nurs Outlook. 2008 May-Jun;56(3):123-31. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.02.004. Nurs Outlook. 2008. PMID: 18501750 Free PMC article.
-
Individual motivation and threat indicators of collaboration readiness in scientific knowledge producing teams: a scoping review and domain analysis.Heliyon. 2016 May;2(5):e00105. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00105. Heliyon. 2016. PMID: 27398411 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring quality and outcomes of research collaborations: An integrative review.J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Oct 11;3(5):261-289. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.402. eCollection 2019 Oct. J Clin Transl Sci. 2019. PMID: 31660251 Free PMC article.
-
Mind the mind: How to effectively communicate about cognition in social-ecological systems research.Ambio. 2019 Jun;48(6):590-604. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1099-7. Epub 2018 Sep 22. Ambio. 2019. PMID: 30244356 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous