Impact of patient characteristics on performance of nucleic acid amplification tests and DNA probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with genital infections
- PMID: 15695648
- PMCID: PMC548082
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.2.577-584.2005
Impact of patient characteristics on performance of nucleic acid amplification tests and DNA probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with genital infections
Abstract
The performance of nucleic acid amplified tests (NAAT) for Chlamydia trachomatis at the cervix and in urine was examined in 3,551 women, and the impacts of clinical findings (age, endocervical and urethral inflammation, menses, and gonococcal coinfection) were assessed. Ligase chain reaction (LCR) and first-generation uniplex PCR were studied relative to an unamplified DNA probe (PACE2) and to an expanded, independent diagnostic reference standard. Relative to the expanded standard, cervical or urine LCR was generally the most sensitive test in most subgroups. Increased detection by NAAT of cervical C. trachomatis over PACE2 was highest among women without mucopurulent endocervical discharge versus those with (relative increase in positivity with cervical LCR, 46%) and among women > or =20 years old versus younger women (relative increase in positivity with cervical LCR, 45%). The sensitivity of cervical PCR was highest when mucopurulent endocervical discharge was present (84%) and highest for cervical LCR when cervical gonococcal coinfection was detected (91%). Urethral inflammation was associated with higher sensitivities of urine LCR (86 compared to 70% when inflammation was absent) and PCR (82 compared to 62% when inflammation was absent). Menses had no effect on test performance. The effects of patient characteristics on test specificities were less pronounced and were closely related to observed sensitivities. These findings support expanded use of NAAT for screening and diagnosis of C. trachomatis in diverse clinical populations of women.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using commercially available nucleic acid amplification tests and a liquid pap smear medium.J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Apr;41(4):1507-11. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1507-1511.2003. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. PMID: 12682137 Free PMC article.
-
Head-to-head multicenter comparison of DNA probe and nucleic acid amplification tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women performed with an improved reference standard.J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Oct;40(10):3757-63. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3757-3763.2002. J Clin Microbiol. 2002. PMID: 12354877 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the Abbott LCx ligase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine and genital swab specimens from a sexually transmitted disease clinic population.J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jun;36(6):1630-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.6.1630-1633.1998. J Clin Microbiol. 1998. PMID: 9620391 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e022510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022510. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30659036 Free PMC article.
-
DNA amplification assays: a new standard for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.Ann Acad Med Singap. 1995 Jul;24(4):627-33. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1995. PMID: 8849200 Review.
Cited by
-
Performance of the Abbott RealTime CT/NG for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Sep;48(9):3236-43. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01019-10. Epub 2010 Jul 28. J Clin Microbiol. 2010. PMID: 20668135 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of the Cepheid CT/NG Xpert Rapid PCR Test for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1666-72. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03461-12. Epub 2013 Mar 6. J Clin Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 23467600 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical evaluation of the BD ProbeTec™ Chlamydia trachomatis Qx amplified DNA assay on the BD Viper™ system with XTR™ technology.Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Jul;38(7):603-9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31820a94d2. Sex Transm Dis. 2011. PMID: 21301389 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae--2014.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014 Mar 14;63(RR-02):1-19. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014. PMID: 24622331 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical specimen order and performance measures of Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing.J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Oct;43(10):5295-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5295-5297.2005. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 16208001 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Black, C. M., J. Marrazzo, R. E. Johnson, E. W. Hook III, R. B. Jones, T. A. Green, J. Schachter, W. E. Stamm, G. Bolan, M. E. St Louis, and D. H. Martin. 2002. Head-to-head multicenter comparison of DNA probe and nucleic acid amplification tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women performed with an improved reference standard. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3757-3763. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Boyadzhyan, B., T. Yashina, J. H. Yatabe, M. Patnaik, and C. S. Hill. 2004. Comparison of the APTIMA CT and GC assays with the APTIMA combo 2 assay, the Abbott LCx assay, and direct fluorescent-antibody and culture assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3089-3093. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2002. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2001. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2002. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2002. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2002 (RR-51):32. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical